The Jobs Numbers and the Next Election

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
April 5 2013 9:11 AM

The Jobs Numbers and the Next Election

Sean Sullivan listicles the jobs numbers -- +88,000, my colleague over at Moneybox has the details -- and asks how they'd affect 2014.

[W]hether the momentum the economy has picked up lately (unemployment was down to its lowest rate since 2008 as of February) stalls,  gathers more steam, or is halted will play a big part in how the public perceives the stewardship of the president – and by extension, the Democratic Party. Obama has set his sights on the very lofty goal of winning back the House majority. It’s a long-shot, even under favorable conditions. If the unemployment rate does not continue to drop, it may be near impossible.

Just on this minor point: Why do people continue to predict state elections viewed through national economic numbers? The Democrats' most vulnerable Senate seats are generally in places where unemployment is lower than the national average -- South Dakota (4.4%), Iowa (5.0%), Montana (5.6%), Louisiana (6.0%), Arkansas (7.2%) and West Virginia (7.3%). The exception is North Carolina (9.4%). It's harder to track the trends in congressional districts, but you've got very specific challenges from place to place related to sequestration, and partisan blame for sequestration.

One of the (pretty widely discussed) parodoxes that hurt Mitt Romney's 2012 campaign was this lumpy, regional unemployment map. Some of the bleakest economies, the ones that drove the national number, were in states locked in for Barack Obama -- Illinois, California, New York, New Jersey. Midwestern and Western swing states were recovering more quickly, helping Obama. The advantage for Republicans, next year, is that they get to play where voters are predisposed to vote against Democrats anyway. And so the budget/spending discussion remains pretty remote from the political stakes, which... which doesn't really change anything, does it? No, the effects of Obamacare implementation matter more than this, and are harder to track.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

There Are New Abuse Allegations Against Adrian Peterson

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

John Oliver Pleads for Scotland to Stay With the U.K.

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter


Don’t Expect Adrian Peterson to Go to Prison

In much of America, beating your kids is perfectly legal. 

The Juice

Ford’s Big Gamble

It’s completely transforming America’s best-selling vehicle.

I Tried to Write an Honest Profile of One of Bollywood’s Biggest Stars. It Didn’t Go Well.

Here’s Why College Women Don’t Take Rape Allegations to the Police

The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 1:51 PM Here’s Why College Women Don’t Take Rape Allegations to the Police
  News & Politics
Sept. 15 2014 8:56 PM The Benghazi Whistleblower Who Might Have Revealed a Massive Scandal on his Poetry Blog
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
Sept. 15 2014 4:38 PM What Is Straight Ice Cream?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 15 2014 8:58 PM Lorde Does an Excellent Cover of Kanye West’s “Flashing Lights”
Future Tense
Sept. 15 2014 4:49 PM Cheetah Robot Is Now Wireless and Gallivanting on MIT’s Campus
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 15 2014 11:00 AM The Comet and the Cosmic Beehive
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.