How to Undo the Obama Presidency by Blocking Judges

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 25 2013 9:06 AM

How to Undo the Obama Presidency by Blocking Judges

President Barack Obama walks toward the White House on March 23, 2012 in Washington, DC after returning from his travel to the Middle East.

Photo by Aude Guerrucci-Pool/Getty Images

The news broke late on Friday, and it didn't even come up on the Sunday shows. Caitlin Halligan, the former New York solicitor general, withdrew as a nominee for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The casus belli for a Republican filibuster was Halligan's work for New York on a gun rights case. The NRA opposed her; the NRA usually gets what it wants in cases like these.

The result, this time, saved one of the beachheads of conservative/libertarian resistence to Obama. No judge has been confirmed to the court since Barack Obama took office. That's left the court with four vacancies, four Republican-appointed judges, and three Democrat-appointed judges, and that's boosted conservative odds of blocking Obama's executive moves. It was a D.C. circuit panel that ruled against Obama's recess appointments to the NLRB. Republicans have cited that decision to call Obama's nominees "unconstitutional," and pre-announce that they'd filibuster any nominee to lead the CFPB. It's helped in other ways, which are named in this very good Haley Edwards piece about the lobbying that's blocking Dodd-Frank.

In September 2012, the U.S. Court for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned the CFTC’s rule. In the decision, the court wrote that the commission lacked a “clear and unambiguous mandate” to set position limits without first demonstrating that they were necessary and appropriate. And with that, more than two years after the passage of Dodd-Frank, there were still no federally administered position limits for any commodities except grain, and the CFTC was back to square one.

For years, Democrats tried to keep the D.C. circuit skewed by blocking Bush nominees. They made one compromise: Allowing Janice Rogers Brown to evade a filibuster and make it on the court. Republicans have returned that favor with filibusters and a status quo that favors them.

David Weigel, a former Slate politics reporter, is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics


Medical Examiner

Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola

Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.

It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is

Divestment Is Fine but Mostly Symbolic. There’s a Better Way for Universities to Fight Climate Change.

I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights

Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.

It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

Building a Better Workplace

In Defense of HR

Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.

Why Is This Mother in Prison for Helping Her Daughter Get an Abortion?

How Ted Cruz and Scott Brown Misunderstand What It Means to Be an American Citizen

  News & Politics
Sept. 23 2014 12:43 PM Occupy Wall Street How can Hillary Clinton be both a limousine liberal and a Saul Alinsky radical?
Sept. 23 2014 2:08 PM Home Depot’s Former Head of Security Had a Legacy of Sabotage
Sept. 23 2014 1:57 PM Would A Second Sarkozy Presidency End Marriage Equality in France?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 23 2014 2:32 PM Politico Asks: Why Is Gabby Giffords So “Ruthless” on Gun Control?
  Slate Plus
Political Gabfest
Sept. 23 2014 3:04 PM Chicago Gabfest How to get your tickets before anyone else.
Brow Beat
Sept. 23 2014 2:31 PM 3 Simpsons Showrunners Reflect on New Fans and the “Classic Era” Myth
Future Tense
Sept. 23 2014 1:50 PM Oh, the Futility! Frogs Try to Catch Worms Off of an iPhone Video.
  Health & Science
Sept. 23 2014 1:38 PM Why Is Fall Red in America but Yellow in Europe? A possible explanation, 35 million years in the making.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.