Why Did Liberals Kill the Medical Device Tax?

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 22 2013 11:10 AM

Why Did Liberals Kill the Medical Device Tax?

The first peals of doom for the Medical Device Tax were heard one year ago, in Massachusetts. For some time, the medical device industry had been lobbying to kill the tax -- a component of Obamacare estimated to raise $30 billion -- by getting Washington wise men to decry it. Dick Gephardt was their first prominent recruit, but come on -- he was Dick Gephardt. But the juice of this effort was hard to recognize until Elizabeth Warren, the Democratic candidate with the best chance of beating a Republican, came out against the tax. As Alec MacGillis reported at the time, it was a useful wedge against Scott Brown.

The measure is unpopular with Massachusetts’s powerful device lobby, and Brown has hammered away at it all year. In April, Warren published an op-ed in an industry trade journal stating that she also favored repealing the tax and replacing its revenue with an “appropriate offset.” Two pro-Warren executives at device-making firms, who find the tax acceptable, told me they were puzzled by her stance.
Advertisement

Warren won, and last night she joined 34 Democrats and cast a symbolic vote to repeal the tax. (Because budget votes don't bind spending, all of the amendments are symbolic.) Sen. Mo Cowan, the temporary Massachussetts senator who probably wants to make money after he's replaced, voted with Warren. Montana's senators, whose state doesn't bustle with medical device industries, voted no -- something that we might have expected, given Baucus's role in writing the health care law, and something that will matter when Max Baucus's Finance committee gets some mitts on tax reform.

For now, though, it's a free "anti-tax" vote for Democrats, and a way to inform an industry's lobbyists that their money's still good.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.