Reince Priebus Admits That Newt Gingrich Was Basically Right About Debates

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 22 2013 3:10 PM

Reince Priebus Admits That Newt Gingrich Was Basically Right About Debates

163938543
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus speaks at the National Press Club March 18, 2013 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

At a small roundtable with reporters today (more about this in a forthcoming piece), RNC Chairman Reince Priebus politely walked through the procedural changes that the GOP wants to make to its next primary. Ron Paul fans loudly protested the rules changes that made it through at the 2012 convention, which bound delegates more closely to the results of primaries—depriving Paulians of the chance to show up at local caucuses or conventions and scoop of delegates. But Priebus was foursquare behind those changes, fretful of future time-wasters like a candidate winning the Wisconsin primary then having to return with "signs and whips" to hold the delegates.

Also: The party needed to cut back on debates.

"We didn't lose because we didn't have 50 debates," said Priebus. "I'm talking about having a reasonable number of debates where we can have a greater say in who the moderators are, because we've got moderators who are in the business of making news, at [our] expense. I think we're committing malpractice when we have no control over who these moderators are and the formats of these primary debates. I'm sure the grassroots would appreciate that."

Advertisement

National Review's Katrina Trinko asked Priebus whether some non-journalist, outside-the-box figures might be tapped to moderate.

"I haven't figured out all the concepts," he said. "I've certainly talked about non-news figures involved in the debates, even having, potentially, grassroots-type debates, having Lincoln-Douglas type debates, even having traditional news as well." The key was something that "protects our primary process, which should involve the Republican party." Hey, Gingrich proved that the media would show up to the Lincoln-Douglas debate.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Jurisprudence

Scalia’s Liberal Streak

The conservative justice’s most brilliant—and surprisingly progressive—moments on the bench.

Colorado Is Ground Zero for the Fight Over Female Voters

There’s a Way to Keep Ex-Cons Out of Prison That Pays for Itself. Why Don’t More States Use It?

The NFL Explains How It Sees “the Role of the Female”

The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B

Culturebox

Theo’s Joint and Vanessa’s Whiskey

No sitcom did the “Very Special Episode” as well as The Cosby Show.

Television

The Other Huxtable Effect

Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.

Cliff Huxtable Explains the World: Five Lessons From TV’s Greatest Dad

Why Television Needs a New Cosby Show Right Now

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 18 2014 8:20 PM A Clever Attempt at Explaining Away a Vote Against the Farm Bill
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 18 2014 6:02 PM A Chinese Company Just Announced the Biggest IPO in U.S. History
  Life
The Slate Quiz
Sept. 18 2014 11:44 PM Play the Slate News Quiz With Jeopardy! superchampion Ken Jennings.
  Double X
Doublex
Sept. 18 2014 8:07 PM Crying Rape False rape accusations exist, and they are a serious problem.
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Sept. 18 2014 1:23 PM “It’s Not Every Day That You Can Beat the World Champion” An exclusive interview with chess grandmaster Fabiano Caruana.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 18 2014 4:33 PM The Top 5 Dadsplaining Moments From The Cosby Show
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 18 2014 6:48 PM By 2100 the World's Population Could Be 11 Billion
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 18 2014 3:35 PM Do People Still Die of Rabies? And how do you know if an animal is rabid?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.