Susan Collins Will Vote for Cloture on Hagel; And, the Emerging Hagel "Delay" Gambit

Weigel
Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Feb. 13 2013 3:42 PM

Susan Collins Will Vote for Cloture on Hagel; And, the Emerging Hagel "Delay" Gambit

157081404
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Sen. Susan Collins makes it semi-official: She will vote for cloture on Chuck Hagel's nomination, then vote against confirming him to run the Department of Defense. "It's a very long statement!" she told reporters as she left a (successful) vote to confirm a Mainer to the First Circuit Court of Appeals. And it is, burying the lede:

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

As a general rule, I believe a President has the right to choose the members of his Cabinet, and only in extraordinary circumstances should such a nomination be filibustered. I oppose Senator Hagel’s nomination, but I cannot join in a filibuster to block each Senator’s right to vote for or against him.

Who else agrees with Collins? I bothered a few senators who, generally, are disinclined to pitch fits over nominees, and I got inconclusive answers.

Advertisement

"Until I hear from John McCain and some of the other guys who have pending questions," said Georgia Sen. Johnny Isakson, "or are waiting to hear from the White House ... once I know all the facts, I'll make that decision."

Sen. Orrin Hatch also hesitated to answer. "I'm not there yet" on cloture, he said. But both Isakson and Hatch preceded their comments by reminding me that cloture had yet to be filed on Hagel. It was a strange kind of caveat—when a nominee makes it out of committee, cloture on the nomination isn't a wild hypothetical question.

My theory? Not all Republicans are as theatrical as Lindsey Graham. They are cool to the idea of an "unprecedented filibuster" of a Cabinet-level nominee. But if they can reframe the filibuster as something else—if it's merely a delay, and they can talk about approving him later—well, then, they get the recess to beat him up (or completely fail to beat him up, as happened this weekend) or beg the White House for more, more, more Benghazi information, like the president's exact actions on the night of the attack.

As loath as the White House is to discuss that, senators seem to think they'll get something. I asked McCain whether the White House had given him anything on Benghazi since he resurrected the filibuster threat. "Not yet," he said, "but I'm optimistic." Sen. Carl Levin, asked whether the McCain questions were fair, shrugged and went along.

"I don't know how it relates to this particular question," he said, "but it's a fair question, and I think it'll get answered."

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Dec. 19 2014 4:15 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? Staff writer Lily Hay Newman shares what stories intrigued her at the magazine this week.