Weigel

Eric Cantor’s State of the Union

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) speaks at the American Enterprise Institute, on February 5, 2013 in Washington, DC.

Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

After a full day of press and build-up, Eric Cantor delivered a 4,671-word speech to the American Enterprise Institute—a veritable State of the Union, complete with shout-outs to heroic citizens in the audience. (“A heroic Dad, Joseph worried that the public school wasn’t helping his son.”)

The highlights:

-Fix the federal jobs training programs that “are not dynamic or innovative enough to meet the needs of employers or potential employees.” (That’s been on the agenda since at least 2011.)

-Allow private employees to use overtime hours for future leave: “An hourly employee cannot convert previous overtime into future comp-time or flex-time. In 1985, Congress passed a law that gave state and municipal employees this flexibility, but today still denies that same privilege to the entire private sector. That’s not right.” That’s new.

-“Provide an opportunity for legal residence and citizenship for those who were brought to this country as children and who know no other home” … but don’t forget about “border security, employment verification and creating a workable guest worker program.” Also somewhat new, because in the current context, any warm words like these amount to a wink at immigration reform.

-Repeal parts of Obamacare such as “the new taxes that are increasing the costs of health care and health insurance, like the medical device tax.” Not at all new—part of Republican budget-cutting efforts since 2011.

-End Medicare’s “arbitrary division between Part A, the hospital program, and Part B, the doctor services. We can create reasonable and predictable levels of out-of-pocket expenses without forcing seniors to rely on Medigap plans.” The return of the “replace” element of “repeal and replace”—and done without the once-standard promise to immediately repeal Obamacare.

-“Provide states more flexibility with respect to Medicaid that will allow them to provide better care for low-income families in a way that ultimately lowers costs. Options for states should include streamlining the process for determining eligibility, and allowing them to offer health coverage through patient-directed health care or flexible benefit programs. And we must make it faster and simpler for states to gain approval of federal waivers to modify their Medicaid programs.” Also somewhat new!