My new piece explains how the NRA endures the backlash from gun massacres. First step: Refusing to comment, with a statement that barely changes from tragedy to tragedy. Second step: Once the outrage fades, telling members and sympathetic conservatives that, yes, the government is going to use the next tragedy to try and confiscate their guns.
I was intrigued by this Gawker piece about the gun-making industry; it argues that activists need to stop yelling about the NRA and start shaming the companies that make weapons. But the "don't focus on the NRA" component is a little pat, because gun manufacturers give millions of dollars to the NRA, they have more money when people panic and buy more guns, and the NRA itself offers services to new gun-owners. You don't need to "demonize" the NRA to appreciate their media strategy -- stoke panic (insist, for example, that "Fast and Furious" might have been a plot to gin up support for gun control), then denounce "politics" in the wake of tragedies.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Democrats’ War at Home
How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?
Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best
Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke
A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking
Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10
Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.
How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.
You Deserve a Pre-cation
The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.