Clement and Scalia Explain That Congress Can't Do Anything Right

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 28 2012 4:45 PM

Clement and Scalia Explain That Congress Can't Do Anything Right

There was another moment from oral arguments that jumped out at me. In theory, there's nothing stopping the Supreme Court from ruling against the health care mandate, and suggesting that Congress needs to find a solution that leaves the rest of the law intact. This was basically the recommendation in Brown ("all deliberate speed"), and it was what the court came up with in the last affirmative action case.

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

A problem: Congress can't really pass anything anymore. "The question is really what task do you want to give Congress?" asked Paul Clement, the brilliant attorney for the plaintiffs. "Do you want to give Congress the task of fixing the statute after something has been taken out, especially a provision at the heart, or do you want to give Congress the task of fixing health care?"


The conversation continued:

CLEMENT: If you strike down only the individual mandate, Congress could say the next day, well, that's the last thing we ever wanted to do; so, we're going to strike down the rest of the statute immediately and then try to fix the problem. So, whatever you do, Congress is going to have options. The question is -­-
SCALIA: Well, there's such a thing as legislative inertia, isn't there?
CLEMENT: Well, that's exactly -­-
SCALIA: I mean -­-
CLEMENT: -- what I was going to say, Justice Scalia, which is I think the question for this Court is -- we all recognize there's legislative inertia. And then the question is what's the best result in light of that reality?
SOTOMAYOR: Are you suggesting that we should take on more power to the Court?
CLEMENT: No, I -­-
SOTOMAYOR: Because Congress would choose to take one path rather than another. That's sort of taking onto the Court more power than one, I think, would want.
CLEMENT: And I agree. We're simply asking this Court to take on, straight on, the idea of the basic remedial inquiry into severability...

The assumption is that Congress can't really do anything of substance here. That's an omen of some kind for "repeal and replace" in 2013.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.