Evangelical Super-Group Endorses Rick Santorum

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Jan. 14 2012 12:49 PM

Evangelical Super-Group Endorses Rick Santorum

On Friday night, more than a hundred evangelical conservative leaders started huddling in Texas, trying to decide on a consensus candidate for president. Surrogates for Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, Rick Perry, and Ron Paul (no one for Jon Huntsman) made their pitches; the evangelicals considered them. On Saturday morning, they voted, and the Family Research Council's Tony Perkins held a call to debrief the media. He saw white smoke.

"What I did not think was possible appears to be possible," said Perkins. After three rounds of balloting, "there emerged a strong consensus around Rick Santorum as the preferred candidate of this room." It was a "clear, clear majority," more than two-thirds of 114 votes, by the time other candidates were dropped off the ballot.


What did it mean? No one was calling for Rick Perry or Newt Gingrich to leave the race, even though the assemblenge included supporters of both candidates. "That," said Perkins, "was not even part of the discussion." There would not, officially, be some new campaign for Santorum by a union of these evangelicals. "It will not be a coordinated effort," said Perkins.

Practically, what would it mean for the the next primary? "There is a hope and expectation that those represented by the constituency will make a difference in South Carolina," said Perkins. But in South Carolina, Newt Gingrich has consistently polled ahead of Santorum, and in the room, Gingrich had the second-largest amount of support. There were, said Perkins, people who switched their allegiance to Santorum anyway, for fear of repeating what is remembered as a disaster: The 2008 nomination of John McCain over a divided field of people who'd actually tried to win over evangelicals.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.