Looking for Racism in a Romney Ad

Weigel
Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Nov. 23 2011 4:19 PM

Looking for Racism in a Romney Ad

looking_for_racism_in_a_romney_ad1322093373578

Two Democrats pass this photo from the Infamous Romney Ad over to Sam Stein.

"There are three things about the racial composition of the people in the background: For Obama, whenever they’re shown clearly, they’re a mix of whites and blacks. Whenever they’re either presented in dark light so you can’t see, or presented at a speed that makes them subliminal, they’re all black," emailed Drew Westen, a professor of psychology at Emory University and the author of “The Political Brain: The Role of Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation.” "For Romney, there isn’t a black person in the background in any of the scenes he’s in. it’s inconceivable that his team didn’t think to make sure there was at least some diversity in the crowds he was speaking to unless the goal was to juxtapose subliminal black people against white people for Romney."
Advertisement

Well, if he says so. I'm told that the offending picture from the ad is b-roll not from an Obama event, but from one of the Congressional Black Caucus job fairs that happened before the last recess. The intended message: In Obama's America, there's a lot of unemployment. And that's true, there is. Black unemployment is the highest it's been in 27 years, stuck in the mid-teens, nearly twice as high as the national average.

If the ad is subliminal, and it's meant to associate Obama with scary black people, who's the intended audience? The Romney campaign keeps pointing out that this ad is only live on one New Hampshire station, and it's going to be seen by Republican primary voters and for-now-unengaged general election voters. The image of a bunch of unemployed black people is supposed to tell them what? That black people -- in scarce supply in this part of New England -- can only be staved off by Mitt Romney? That they're on welfare? No, the ad never mentions that.

As with everything else about the ad, this can be explained as 1) subtle political brilliance that was caught, 2) a pure accident, or 3) really subtle brilliance aimed at making liberals go insane and give the ad free attention.

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

TODAY IN SLATE

The World

The Budget Disaster that Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola

Are the Attacks in Canada a Sign of ISIS on the Rise in the West?

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

Is It Offensive When Kids Use Bad Words for Good Causes?

Fascinating Maps Based on Reddit, Craigslist, and OkCupid Data

Culturebox

The Real Secret of Serial

What reporter Sarah Koenig actually believes.

Culturebox

The Actual World

“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.

In Praise of 13th Grade: Why a Fifth Year of High School Is a Great Idea

Can Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu Pull Off One More Louisiana Miracle?

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 23 2014 3:55 PM Panda Sluggers Democrats are in trouble. Time to bash China.
  Business
Business Insider
Oct. 23 2014 2:36 PM Take a Rare Peek Inside the Massive Data Centers That Power Google
  Life
Atlas Obscura
Oct. 23 2014 1:34 PM Leave Me Be Beneath a Tree: Trunyan Cemetery in Bali
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 23 2014 11:33 AM Watch Little Princesses Curse for the Feminist Cause
  Slate Plus
Working
Oct. 23 2014 11:28 AM Slate’s Working Podcast: Episode 2 Transcript Read what David Plotz asked Dr. Meri Kolbrener about her workday.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 23 2014 3:23 PM This Is What Bette Midler Covering TLC’s “Waterfalls” Sounds Like
  Technology
Technology
Oct. 23 2014 11:45 AM The United States of Reddit  How social media is redrawing our borders. 
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 23 2014 7:30 AM Our Solar System and Galaxy … Seen by an Astronaut
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.