How Cuts-for-Aid Killed the CR (for Now)

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Sept. 21 2011 6:00 PM

How Cuts-for-Aid Killed the CR (for Now)

The House of Representatives just voted down the GOP's version of a continuing resolution to fund the government through November -- a 230-195 thwacking, with 48 Republicans and almost all Democrats voting against the majority's bill. How? Why? This CR, which included $1 billion of FEMA funding, also included $1.5 billion of cuts to an efficient vehicle program that Democrats supported.

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

"Wait a minute," you say. "Didn't I read, three weeks ago or so, that Republicans weren't going to risk sinking the FEMA funding by attaching things to the vote."

Advertisement

You almost read that. When Majority Leader Eric Cantor was asked if FEMA funds would be tied to cuts, he implied that they would be, then rejected the notion that he would hold anything "hostage" when relief was on the line. After all, his district was among the places that would need relief. I had this exchange with his spokesman at the time.

"The House passed, and Leader Cantor supported, the DHS appropriations bill, which includes additional money to replenish the FEMA disaster fund (which is now low)," explains Brad Dayspring, Cantor's spokesman. "That funding was offset. The Senate has thus far failed to act on that legislation. There has been no additional request made for emergency dollars. If emergency funding is requested, surely the House will respond appropriately at that time. In the interim, we can't respond to an emergency request that doesn't yet exist.  There would be no delay is people getting federal relief."
...
"How much would the request be for?" says Dayspring. "What do the Govs say is needed? I can tell you that obviously no one would stand in the way of urgently needed funding, that’s just silly."

And ThinkProgress, which was skeptical where I was overly credulous, has some video of Cantor rejecting this "hostage" idea.

The immediate request turned out to be $500 million. Instead of setting up a vote on this, the GOP put a package together. There would be $1 billion of FEMA funds, twice what was requested. There would be $2.6 billion for a disaster fund that had been set up by the debt deal. And, oh, there would be "pay-fors" in the form of cuts to that efficiency program, which Democrats wanted.

At his briefing with reporters yesterday, Cantor repeatedly explained that the GOP was offering a fair deal, and Democrats -- who had voted on a "clean" funding bill in the Senate -- were "playing politics."

"You know," said Cantor, "Steny [Hoyer] said in his colloquy with me last week that he was going to support the bill. Clearly, there is a game of politics being played here. The House is going to act. We are going to deliver the money to the victims of the disasters. All of you know my district was particularly affected, first by the earthquake, and then by the high winds associated with Irene. There is no question that the money will be delivered. This is all about a political game for Harry Reid. I know Steny Hoyer understands that. Steny Hoyer also understands that we need to move on disaster relief, and do so responsibly."

I asked Cantor if this plan represented a change from three weeks ago -- some people were under the impression that the vote would not be tied to anything.

"I think the discussion back then would probably prompt my same response," he said. "Let's not conflate the two issues here. There is an issue of emergency funding, which is the context for the pay for discussion, and there is that which we budget for. The emergency funding is offset, and we did so responsibly. The budgeted for amounts is for the fiscal year 2012 number, front loaded so the agency can access monies if it needs it."

Democrats didn't buy this. A rump of Republicans didn't want the bill at all. So the CR went down.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

Politics

The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.