Adam Serwer notices that three GOP presidential candidates have signed the National Organization for Marriage's new pledge. "So they pledged to oppose gay marriage?" you ask. Well, yes. That and more.
Serwer focuses on the not-very-federalist idea of a president forcing a city to have a marriage referendum that its elected leaders don't want to have. I'm fixated at the idea of the presidential commission. The "harassment" being referred to, if we're taking NOM's recent legal activity and arguments into account, includes public records reports and journalism about who's donating to political campaigns. So this is a request for presidential candididates to give special protections to certain people based on their political beliefs. And presidential candidates, not wanting headlines like "GOP candidate disses marriage pledge," sign on.
Misty water-colored memories:
TODAY IN SLATE
Smash and Grab
Will competitive Senate contests in Kansas and South Dakota lead to more late-breaking races in future elections?
Stop Panicking. America Is Now in Very Good Shape to Respond to the Ebola Crisis.
The 2014 Kansas City Royals Show the Value of Building a Mediocre Baseball Team
The GOP Won’t Win Any Black Votes With Its New “Willie Horton” Ad
Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band
Can it be again?
Forget Oculus Rift
This $25 cardboard box turns your phone into an incredibly fun virtual reality experience.