Gingrich on Ryan Plan: "Radical" and "Right-Wing Social Engineering"

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
May 16 2011 9:00 AM

Gingrich on Ryan Plan: "Radical" and "Right-Wing Social Engineering"

David Gregory asks Newt Gingrich about the Ryan plan and the wheels on the bus go clunk, crunch, splatter:

GREGORY: Do you think that Republicans ought to buck the public opposition and really move forward to completely change Medicare , turn it into a voucher program where you give seniors some premium support and -- so that they can go out and buy private insurance ?

GINGRICH: I don't think right-wing social engineering is any more desirable than left-wing social engineering . I don't think imposing radical change from the right or the left is a very good way for a free society to operate. I think we need a national conversation to get to a better Medicare system with more choices for seniors. But there are specific things you can do .


This is genuinely surprising, for two reasons. One: As speaker, Gingrich tried to cut the rate of growth in Medicare spending, saying he was preserving the program but taking it back to its original model. He and the GOP were beaten up remorselessly. He said it was unfair. And given the chance to save a fellow Republican House leader from a similar buffeting, Gingrich doesn't do it.

Two: Gingrich supported the Ryan plan two weeks ago.

The former speaker sang Ryan’s praises for being a "brave" "man of ideas," like Gingrich himself.

"But would you have voted for Ryan’s plan?" I pressed.

"Sure," Gingrich replied.

"Do you think it would actually save the health care system?"

There is wiggle room here. John McCormack tracks what Gingrich has been saying and finds that, despite the statement to Newton-Small, he's been arguing for a middle rout between Ryan and nothing -- an optional private plan, similar to Rivlin-Domenici. But the Meet the Press interview gives air cover to Democrats and doubles back on his old, "brave" position. Being generous to Gingrich, the interview reads like he went for buzzier, more declarative language rather than finesse. The result of that: Air cover for Democrats attacking the plan.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 



Meet the New Bosses

How the Republicans would run the Senate.

The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Cheez-Its. Ritz. Triscuits.

Why all cracker names sound alike.

Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom

The Eye

This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059

Medical Examiner

Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?  

A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.

The Afghan Town With a Legitimately Good Tourism Pitch

A Futurama Writer on How the Vietnam War Shaped the Series

  News & Politics
Sept. 21 2014 11:34 PM People’s Climate March in Photos Hundreds of thousands of marchers took to the streets of NYC in the largest climate rally in history.
Business Insider
Sept. 20 2014 6:30 AM The Man Making Bill Gates Richer
Sept. 22 2014 8:07 AM Why Haven’t the Philadelphia Eagles Ever Won a Super Bowl?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Sept. 22 2014 8:08 AM Slate Voice: “Why Is So Much Honey Clover Honey?” Mike Vuolo shares the story of your honey.
Sept. 21 2014 9:00 PM Attractive People Being Funny While Doing Amusing and Sometimes Romantic Things Don’t dismiss it. Friends was a truly great show.
Future Tense
Sept. 22 2014 7:47 AM Predicting the Future for the U.S. Government The strange but satisfying work of creating the National Intelligence Council’s Global Trends report.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 22 2014 5:30 AM MAVEN Arrives at Mars
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.