Today, the White House started sending out endorsements of the tax cut deal from big city mayors -- i.e., Democratic politicians who won't get to vote on the deal. Snark resulted. Here was mine:
And here was the response from Robert Gibbs, the White House press secretary.
In all seriousness (if that's still possible) -- why were we reporters making fun of this? The mayors don't get votes, yes, so their endorsements do nothing to answer the immediate question "will this compromise pass?" They are, however, mayors, who have constituents who pay taxes and/or get unemployment benefits. And prior to these exchanges, you could read stories like this:
Sarah Palin is a conservative author and Fox News commentator. (Prior to August 2009, she was governor of Alaska.) She is influential among conservatives and can help carve out the "correct" position for them on an issue. But there's really no evidence that Palin is or can sway Republican votes against the tax cut compromise -- she has no pull over either of her senators these days -- while mayors of large cities can influence the way their senators vote. So, I suppose, let that be our lesson. (Also, Jennifer Rubin
pointed out pretty succinctly
why Palin's response was meritless.)
TODAY IN SLATE
Meet the New Bosses
How the Republicans would run the Senate.
The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers
Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.
Photos of the Crowds That Took Over NYC for the People’s Climate March
Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom
This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059
Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?
A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.