The Awkward Relationship Between WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning

How It Works
Aug. 21 2013 1:50 PM

WikiLeaks Declares “Strategic Victory” After Manning Sentence

177142281
FORT MEADE, MD - AUGUST 21: US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning is escorted by military police as he arrives for his sentencing at military court facility for the sentencing phase of his trial on August 21, 2013 in Fort Meade, Maryland.

Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images

While not exactly celebratory, the following tweet seems to indicate that WikiLeaks at least feels today’s 35-year sentence for Pfc. Bradley Manning could have been a lot worse:

Advertisement

Indeed, with three and a half years of time served, Manning will be eligible for parole in a little over eight years, when he’ll be 33. He could have been sentenced to up to 90 years in prison for charges that include violations of the Espionage Act.

While WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have certainly been outspoken in their support of Manning and have raised money (though that’s a complicated story) for his defense, the situation has always been a bit awkward given the fact that the organization has not explicitly acknowledged that Manning provided it with documents.

Even though Manning has now publicly admitted to providing files to WikiLeaks, Assange’s statement after the verdict was reached on July 30 still referred to his “alleged disclosures,” but he also somewhat awkwardly credited them for having “exposed war crimes, sparked revolutions, and induced democratic reform.”

Keeping sources anonymous is, after all, the whole point of WikiLeaks and the fate that awaited Manning after he began communicating with the “crazy white haired aussie” isn’t a great advertisement for future whistleblowers.

Joshua Keating is a staff writer at Slate focusing on international affairs and writes the World blog. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

Politics

The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.