This pamphlet, entered in the Records of the House of Representatives in 1866, runs through often-heard objections to women’s suffrage, striking down each.
The document lets us see which anti-suffrage arguments were commonly advanced, 18 years after activists at the Seneca Falls Convention first asked for the franchise. According to the author of the pamphlet, people arguing against suffrage would say that women were too precious to be risked at polling stations or corrupted by politics. Opponents tended to fret over the effects of suffrage on the household, or argue that women were too silly or too different from men to vote.
There’s quite a bit of humor in the pamphlet, as the author pokes fun at men who bloviate in town meeting and complain to their wives of the difficulty of their work. Despite their foolishness, “every man has a right to express his own folly at the ballot-box, if he will,” the author writes. “Why not every woman too?” The very foundations of democracy depended upon it.
This appears to be an early version of a later pamphlet written by minister and activist Thomas Wentworth Higginson. Higginson worked for suffrage, temperance, and abolitionist causes. (He also carried on a longtime correspondence with Emily Dickinson.)
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself.
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.