Kurdistan and Catalonia: Two very different places learn how hard it is to start a new country.

Kurdistan and Catalonia: Two Very Different Places Learn How Hard It Is to Start a New Country

Kurdistan and Catalonia: Two Very Different Places Learn How Hard It Is to Start a New Country

The Slatest has moved! You can find new stories here.
The Slatest
Your News Companion
Oct. 3 2017 12:46 PM

Kurdistan and Catalonia: Two Very Different Places Learn How Hard It Is to Start a New Country

Aftermath-Of-The-Catalonian-Independence-Referendum
A group of demonstrators take a break from a march in front of a closed shop during a regional general strike to protest against the violence that marred Sunday's referendum vote on Tuesday in Barcelona, Spain.

Getty Images

Over the past two weeks, two very different nations—Iraqi Kurdistan and Catalonia—have taken steps toward declaring themselves independent states. Both have been met with hostility by the countries they’re trying to split from, and indifference from the rest of the world. Both have sent a strong message to nationalists and secessionists around the globe: The established countries are an exclusive club that’s typically reluctant to admit new members. Both places have learned just how few advantages separatists have in breaking into that club.

Joshua Keating Joshua Keating

Joshua Keating is a staff writer at Slate focusing on international affairs and author of the forthcoming book, Invisible Countries.

More than a week on from its independence referendum, Kurdistan remains in limbo. Its leaders have not unilaterally declared independence and have no plans to do so, but the Shiite Arab–led Iraqi government in Baghdad has rejected calls for negotiations on independence and imposed a ban on international flights to the region’s two main airports. The Iraqi Parliament is calling for the government to send troops to disputed Kurdish-controlled regions. Neighbors Iran and Turkey, which are seeking to tamp down nationalist aspirations among their own Kurdish populations, have backed Baghdad, though Turkey has not yet followed through on threats to cut off the cross-border flow of oil and trucks, Kurdistan’s economic lifeline to the outside world.

Advertisement

With the exception of Israel, no other major governments have backed the referendum, including Kurdistan’s close ally the United States. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson called the vote “illegitimate.”

In the end, the referendum seems to have been a short-term political gain for Kurdish Regional Government President Masoud Barzani, who has called for new elections on Nov. 1, but hasn’t gotten the Kurds any closer to internationally recognized statehood. The current tensions may simmer down, but Kurdistan will still be stuck as a not-quite-country for the foreseeable future.

Unlike the Kurds, Catalans have not been victims of genocide or recently taken up arms against their government, but the aftermath of the referendum there turned out to be far more chaotic and violent, as national police stepped in, using truncheons and rubber bullets to shut down a vote viewed by Madrid as illegal and unconstitutional. Pro-independence groups and unions called a general strike Tuesday and protests have broken out throughout the region. It’s a striking contrast with Europe’s previous major separatist challenge, Scotland’s 2014 independence vote, during which the British government peacefully and successfully made the case for keeping the United Kingdom united.

More than 90 percent of those who took part in the referendum voted yes, though the turnout was only 42 percent, and it’s likely that most opponents of independence stayed away from the polls. Nonetheless, Catalan leader Carles Puigdemont has declared the vote valid, and could declare Catalonia’s independence within days.* The level of political breakdown on display here is something new and unprecedented for a Western European democracy in recent years.

Advertisement

So far, no foreign governments have supported the referendum. The EU, opposed to the referendum, has equivocated in its response to the Spanish government’s crackdown, and independent Catalonia would likely lose its EU membership. President Trump said in a meeting with Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy last week that he believes Spain should “remain united.”  

There are some who sense political opportunity in the chaos. Serbia’s government accused Western powers of hypocrisy for refusing to accept the Catalonia referendum while backing the independence of Kosovo, which Serbia still refuses to accept. (When I was in the Russian-backed separatist enclave of Abkhazia last year, I heard a lot of similar complaints about Kosovo hypocrisy.)

Pro-Russian media and trolls were also heavily deployed in the run-up to the referendum, giving favorable coverage to the separatists and drawing parallels to Crimea’s controversial 2014 referendum to join Russia. As with other Russian info operations, including the one during the last U.S. presidential election, these meddlers didn’t create the fissure so much as exploit tensions that were already there, in this case to undermine European unity.

Spain’s heavy-handed response to the referendum is likely to only exacerbate these tensions, bolster the case of the separatists, and make it easier for outside actors to exploit the resulting divisions.

*Correction, Oct. 3: This post originally misspelled the name of the leader of Catalonia.