Chris Christie’s Trump endorsement, explained.

It Seems Crazy That Christie Endorsed Trump. But Actually, It Makes Sense.

It Seems Crazy That Christie Endorsed Trump. But Actually, It Makes Sense.

The Slatest
Your News Companion
Feb. 26 2016 5:31 PM

Why Christie Endorsed Trump

508807858-republican-presidential-candidates-new-jersey-governor
Chris Christie and Donald Trump shake hands during a commercial break in the Republican presidential debate at St. Anselm College Feb. 6 in Manchester, New Hampshire.

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

On Friday afternoon, Chris Christie endorsed Donald Trump for president. It was a move no one saw coming. CNN and the Huffington Post both called it a “surprise,” the Washington Post and Politico went with “stunning,” and the New York Times described it as a “major turn in a wild race.” Here at Slate, I reached the same conclusion.

Josh Voorhees Josh Voorhees

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 

Christie spent months running in the so-called establishment lane against Marco Rubio, John Kasich, and Jeb Bush, and it stood to reason that Christie would eventually throw his support to one of those party-approved candidates—and that he meant it when he said things like, “We do not need reality TV in the Oval Office right now.” Christie and Trump also clashed repeatedly while the New Jersey Republican was still in the race, fighting over whether thousands of Muslim Americans celebrated on 9/11 as Trump claimed (they didn’t), whether Trump’s plan to bar Muslims from entering the country is ridiculous (it is), and whether Trump has the necessary temperament and policy knowledge to be the commander in chief of United States (he doesn’t). And, as my colleague Ben Mathis-Lilley reminds us, Trump accused Christie of conspiring to commit bridge-themed fraud, and Christie literally put Trump’s daughter’s father-in-law behind bars a decade ago. So, yeah, we can all agree this was an unexpected plot twist.

Advertisement

And yet in hindsight, Christie’s decision makes a certain amount of sense. He can’t run for re-election as governor in 2017 because of New Jersey’s term limits, and he’s so unpopular among his constituents it’s hard to imagine that he’d win any other office in the state either. If Christie wants to stay in politics, his best chance is to find a home in a Republican administration—if not as vice president, perhaps attorney general or another cabinet position—and he’s far more likely to get that from a President Trump than he would from a President Rubio or President Ted Cruz. For as much as Christie clashed with Trump during the past year, he premised his entire run on the idea that first-term senators like Rubio and Cruz are unfit to lead. And his relatively moderate brand of East Coast conservatism and occasional willingness to challenge party orthodoxy line up much better with Trump than they do with either Rubio or Cruz. (Of those two, Christie has more in common with Rubio—in posture, if not exactly policy—though after forcing the Florida senator’s malfunction on the New Hampshire debate stage, it’s difficult to imagine Rubio forgiving Christie even if he got his endorsement.)

Trump, meanwhile, is increasingly likely to be his party’s nominee. While the odds would be stacked against him come November, politically speaking it’s much better to support a long shot in the general election than it is to back one in the nominating race. Sure, Christie risks alienating Republican Party big wigs by not falling in line behind their chosen candidate, Rubio, but such an endorsement would have been largely lost among the flood of other establishment figures who are now rallying around Rubio. Endorsing Trump thrusts Christie back into the national conversation in a way that he never was during his campaign and that a more traditional endorsement ever could. (The only other option available to Christie would have been to back fellow governor John Kasich, which would have come with similar establishment-angering risks but none of the potential rewards.)

If Christie has no interest in public office after he’s done in Trenton, backing Trump makes even more sense. Say what you want about the Donald’s business acumen and ethics—Slate has!—but he’s clearly a good friend to have if you’re eager to make money in New York City or beyond. That’s true whether Trump’s working in the White House or in Trump Tower. Bucking the GOP and donning a Make America Great Again hat will also make Christie more attractive to cable news networks looking to hand out lucrative contracts down the road. Fox News still doesn’t know exactly what it wants to do with Trump, but it’s clear they want him on TV. By hitching his wagon to the former reality television star, Christie becomes that much more interesting to the Fox brass. He’ll certainly get a lengthy tryout as Trump’s new surrogate this spring.

In the end, then, Christie is most likely backing Trump not out of spite toward Rubio (though that is certainly an added benefit), but instead for the same reason politicians on both sides of the aisle make most of their decisions—because it’s in their own self-interest. If Trump really does win the nomination, that’s the same reason we can expect many of those Republican who say they despise Trump today to eventually change their mind.