Wolf Blitzer and CNN do not exceed expectations at the GOP debate.

Another Terrible Night for CNN, a Microcosm of American Decline

Another Terrible Night for CNN, a Microcosm of American Decline

The Slatest has moved! You can find new stories here.
The Slatest
Your News Companion
Feb. 25 2016 11:20 PM

Another Terrible Night for CNN, a Microcosm of American Decline

512369786-moderator-wolf-blitzer-of-cnn-listens-to-the-answers-to
Wolf Blitzer at CNN’s GOP debate at the University of Houston on Feb. 25, 2016 in Houston, Texas.

Michael Ciaglo–Pool/Getty Images

Donald Trump’s constant refrain about American decline, which has been heard throughout this campaign season, had an ironic undertone when uttered at Thursday night’s debate on CNN. Other than Trump’s rise, there is no clearer sign of American decline than this erstwhile news network, which now combines superficial political coverage and tabloid-friendly content with none of the skill displayed by (the admittedly much more heinous) Fox News. Thursday’s debate was no exception: Wolf Blitzer’s questions were soft, and his follow-ups indirect. By the end, he seemed to have completely ceded control of the debate. It was a failure of hosting, but also a fitting metaphor for a news network that has completely lost its way.

Isaac Chotiner Isaac Chotiner

Isaac Chotiner is a Slate staff writer.

One of the problems with an election campaign that extends forever, with a seemingly endless series of debates, is that candidates receive the same questions at forum after forum. You might think that Blitzer, who has hosted numerous debates and quizzed all of the candidates repeatedly, would be aware of this, and try to ask questions that elicited at least a modicum of surprise from the men running for the presidency. Instead, Blitzer began with questions about immigration and the border wall that even casual debate viewers have heard numerous times. Even worse, when the candidates gave their canned, dishonest answers, he didn’t follow up with any force. (María Celeste Arrarás, the Telemundo anchor who asked a couple questions during this segment, was much more effective, pushing back against Trump’s answers about his appeal to Latino voters.)

Advertisement

Things descended further when Hugh Hewitt, the conservative talk-show host, who for God-knows-what reason was chosen to co-moderate CNN’s debates, decided to focus on religious liberty. Instead of asking about, say, the fact that the three leading candidates on stage had all made gross comments about Islam—with Trump of course calling to ban Muslims from entering the country—Hewitt decided to focus on cupcake-baking Christians whose liberty is apparently being threatened by gay-marriage supporters. It’s bad enough that the entire Republican Party seems to view racism in America as something that happens to white people, and American religious bigotry as something that targets Christians; it’s even worse when CNN’s questions appear to tacitly support the latter assumption.

When the debate turned to health care, Dana Bash did momentarily follow up on Donald Trump’s blather about coverage across state lines, asking the candidate to add details about his health plan. She could have lingered over the moment, but instead turned to John Kasich and Ben Carson, who gave empty answers. The end of the health care section ended with Ted Cruz bullying Blitzer into giving him a bunch of extra time; this pattern would recur.

Blitzer then turned to the economy, prefacing a question by granting Trump’s claims that his tax cuts would lead to economic growth. When he then asked Trump about Mitt Romney’s criticism of him for not releasing his tax returns, he did so in remarkably vague language; Trump, predictably, didn’t really answer. (There were several moments in the debate where it fell to the other candidates to follow up on the moderators’ questions, and demand answers from their fellow candidates.)

The conservative tone of the questions continued with Blitzer’s about Israel, which faulted Trump for his rather reasonable claim that he would remain neutral in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. (Trump’s other statements about the Middle East suggest that he would—like the other Republicans onstage and Hillary Clinton—favor Israel.) Blitzer continued with Israel and the Palestinians by asking Cruz and Kasich to comment on Trump’s answer; it was part of a weird pattern wherein the moderators wanted the candidates to respond to Trump, but then kept interrupting them when they actually engaged him.

In all, it was a disappointing debate that showcased everything that has gone wrong at CNN. Presumably sick of being accused of having a liberal bias, CNN has given plentiful airtime to Trump without really challenging him. (Anyone who doubts this should check out his interviews with the hapless Don Lemon.) Even if ratings are the main reason that this is the case, it doesn’t explain the conservative premises of many of the questions, or their lack of depth.

Immediately after the forum ended, moreover, CNN’s Chris Cuomo conducted an absurd onstage interview with Trump, asking him softball questions, and even suggesting that the candidate had focused on policy during the debate! Trump may enjoy ranting about the media, but there is no question that CNN, like the other cable news networks, has done nothing but abet his rise.