Hillary Clinton one-phone defense: Even more questionable given that she carried multiple phones, electronics.

Hillary Didn’t Want to Deal with Two Phones, But Had an iPad and an iPad Mini

Hillary Didn’t Want to Deal with Two Phones, But Had an iPad and an iPad Mini

The Slatest
Your News Companion
March 10 2015 6:49 PM

More Reasons to Seriously Doubt Hillary's “Convenience” Excuse

103044618-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-looks-at-her-mobile
Hillary Clinton looks at her phone after attending a meeting in Hanoi in July 2010.

Photo by Na Son Nguyen/AFP/Getty Images.

After a week’s worth of silence, Hillary Clinton on Tuesday finally offered an explanation for why she opted to use a private email address to do government business while secretary of state. It wasn’t a good one. She says she made the decision simply because she didn’t want to carry around two phones.

Josh Voorhees Josh Voorhees

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 

I am, to put it mildly, skeptical of that answer, given that not wanting two phones conveniently gave Clinton—a public official known to prize her privacy (or secrecy)—unprecedented control over her government records. But there’s another reason to doubt Clinton’s defense, and the Internet quickly provided it in the immediate aftermath of her press conference.

Advertisement

In a video clip from a Silicon Valley event last month, Clinton was asked whether she preferred an iPhone or an Android smartphone. “iPhone,” she responded, before adding, “in full disclosure, and a Blackberry.” The footage was first surfaced by American Rising, a Republican PAC that specializes in uncovering exactly this type of thing.

The clip itself is only 18 seconds long but, according to the Washington Examiner, the full quote doesn’t exactly help her case. “There are reasons when you start out in Washington on a Blackberry you stay on it in many instances. But it's also — I don't know, I don't throw anything away. I'm like two steps short of a hoarder. So I have an iPad, a mini iPad, an iPhone and a Blackberry."

Exhibit B in the case against convenience comes via a social media townhall event that Clinton hosted in the Philippines in 2011, when she was still secretary of state. Clinton was asked “what’s inside your purse” and “what’s on your iPod or iPad?” Here is her full answer, according to State Department transcripts:

Well, I have a quite large purse, because when you travel as much as I do, you never know what you’re going to need. So in addition to makeup and all that goes with that, usually my Blackberry and papers of all kinds, because I can’t get away with a small purse because I’m in and out of meetings all the time. So it’s kind of a purse/briefcase sort of operation going on here. But when I go overseas, like on this trip, there are many more bags that come with me than just my purse in case something else is needed. And my iPod, just the usual wonderful musical “interluding” diversions that we all need, a wide variety. And on my iPad, I have to confess, mostly news sites, because I do a lot of looking to see what’s going on around the world.

Clearly, neither of those remarks supports the idea that Clinton prefers to travel light, and both only add to my skepticism about her professed love of convenience. (An iPad and an iPad mini?!?) Still, I’m not sure either comment is quite the smoking gun people are looking for.

If you are inclined to think Clinton isn’t telling the truth, then you probably think there was room in that purse for a government smartphone. I certainly do. But if you buy her defense, than you could just as easily make the argument that, given everything Clinton was carrying, the last thing she needed was to have to dig around for multiple phones.

In the end, the very same thing that got Clinton into this mess is what will likely get her out of it: Because she’s the only one with access to the private server that hosted her email, she’s the only one who knows the truth about how she used it. The press and the public can doubt her, but barring any unforeseen development, it’ll always be her word against theirs.