Bush-Era Memos: president can wiretap Americans at any time.

Bush-Era Memos: President Has Authority to Wiretap Americans at Any Time

Bush-Era Memos: President Has Authority to Wiretap Americans at Any Time

The Slatest
Your News Companion
Sept. 6 2014 1:52 PM

Bush-Era Memos: President Has Authority to Wiretap Americans at Any Time

84255474-president-george-w-bush-holds-a-news-conference-in-the
Then-president George W. Bush holds a news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House on January 12, 2009.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

In a classic Friday night document dump, the Justice Department released two decade-old memos that provide the most clear picture yet of the way President George W. Bush’s administration justified wiretapping communications by Americans without a warrant. Although the basic justifications for the program that the New York Times unmasked in 2005 were already known, “the sweep of the reasoning becomes even clearer in the memos written by then-Assistant Attorney General Jack Goldsmith,” points out the Washington Post.

In a 108-page 2004 memo, Goldsmith writes that if there has been attack on the United States the president “has inherent constitutional authority”  to order wiretapping without a warrant. And this power involves “an authority that Congress cannot curtail,” Goldsmith wrote. That authority is so broad that being at war isn’t even necessary. Citing the Federalist papers, Goldsmith writes that the president can conduct warrantless searches for foreign intelligence “even in peacetime.”

Advertisement

The conclusion of the memos “are deeply disturbing,” says Patrick Toomey, a staff attorney at the ACLU, which was one of the organizations that obtained the memos through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. “They suggest that the president’s power to monitor the communications of Americans is virtually unlimited—by the Constitution, or by Congress—when it comes to foreign intelligence.” But the memos also illustrate how several years after the program first began, lawyers were still “struggling to put the program on sound legal footing,” adds Toomey.

Daniel Politi has been contributing to Slate since 2004 and wrote the Today’s Papers column from 2006 to 2009. Follow him on Twitter.