Largest U.S. Presbyterian Church Votes to Allow Gay Marriage

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
June 19 2014 6:59 PM

Largest U.S. Presbyterian Church Votes to Allow Gay Marriage

Par7369117
Same-sex wedding coming to a Presbyterian church near you.

Photo by THOMAS SAMSON/AFP/Getty Images

The largest Presbyterian denomination in the US took a step towards changing the Christian group's stance on gay marriage on Thursday. The governing body of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A) voted to change the church’s definition of marriage to “two people” instead of “a man and a woman,” the Associated Press reports. The change, approved at the top, will need to be ratified by 172 regional affiliates over the next year. The church also voted to immediately allow its ministers to preside over same-sex marriages in its churches in states where it is now legal.

The vote to redefine marriage in the church, backed three-to-one in the vote, is expected to be approved by the rest of the church, according to Religion News Service. The issue of redefining marriage to include same-sex couples came up for a vote in 2012, but was defeated. The church has been suffering declining membership, and since 2011, according to the AP, “428 of the denomination's more than 10,000 churches have left for other more conservative denominations or have dissolved."

Advertisement

The church—home to some 1.8 million members—has lost 37 percent of its membership since 1992, which may have paved the way for the latest vote, according to Religion News Service.

These losses have been led by conservative-leaning congregations that defected over what they lamented as the church’s embrace of more liberal values. Those defections — many to smaller and more conservative Presbyterian denominations — made it more likely that the General Assembly would approve a gay marriage resolution this year.

“Given that Presbyterians are historically an influential denomination, the vote could persuade other Christian groups to follow,” experts told the Detroit Free Press.

Elliot Hannon is a writer in Washington, D.C. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

The Democrats’ War at Home

How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?

Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best

Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke

A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking

Animal manure.

Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10

Politics

Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.

How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.

Building a Better Workplace

You Deserve a Pre-cation

The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.

Hasbro Is Cracking Down on Scrabble Players Who Turn Its Official Word List Into Popular Apps

Florida State’s New President Is Underqualified and Mistrusted. He Just Might Save the University.

  News & Politics
Jurisprudence
Sept. 30 2014 2:36 PM This Court Erred The Supreme Court has almost always sided with the wealthy, the privileged, and the powerful, a new book argues.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 30 2014 7:02 PM At Long Last, eBay Sets PayPal Free
  Life
Lexicon Valley
Sept. 30 2014 1:23 PM What Can Linguistics Tell Us About Writing Better? An Interview with Steven Pinker.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Sept. 30 2014 3:21 PM Meet Jordan Weissmann Five questions with Slate’s senior business and economics correspondent.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 30 2014 8:54 PM Bette Davis Talks Gender Roles in a Delightful, Animated Interview From 1963
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 30 2014 7:00 PM There’s Going to Be a Live-Action Tetris Movie for Some Reason
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 30 2014 6:44 PM Ebola Was Already Here How the United States contains deadly hemorrhagic fevers.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.