A federal judge on Monday ordered Ohio to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. The ruling strikes down only portions of the state’s ban on same-sex marriage that prohibit the recognition of marriages performed in other states. Even still, the ruling is “a partial but significant victory for gay rights supporters,” according to the Associated Press.
“Ohio’s marriage recognition is facially unconstitutional and unenforceable under any circumstances,” Judge Timothy Black said in a written statement. The suit was filed in February by four couples, married in other states, who were seeking to have the names of both parents on their children’s birth certificates. The state’s non-recognition of legal same-sex marriages performed elsewhere meant that only one parent’s name could appear on a child's birth certificate.
Black’s ruling does not affect Ohio’s 2004 ban on same-sex marriages performed in the state because, as Cincinnati’s WVXU reports, “the lawsuit did not seek to allow same-sex partners to get married in Ohio, just the recognition of marriages from other states.” In handing down his decision, Black stayed the enforcement of the order pending appeal, meaning that the ruling, for the time being, will only apply to the four couples in the suit.
Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine’s office said it will appeal the ruling.
TODAY IN SLATE
Don’t Expect Adrian Peterson to Go to Prison
In much of America, beating your children is perfectly legal.
Ken Burns on Why Teddy Roosevelt Would Never Get Elected in 2014
Cops Briefly Detain Django Unchained Actress Because They Thought She Was a Prostitute
Minimalist Cocktail Posters Make Mixing Drinks a Cinch
How the Apple Watch Will Annoy Us
A glowing screen attached to someone else’s wrist is shinier than all but the blingiest of jewels.
Rainbow Parties and Sex Bracelets
Where teenage sex rumors come from—and why they’re bad for parents and kids.
You Had to Be There
What we can learn from things that used to be funny.