Maybe Those Cold-Hearted Texts to the MH370 Families Weren't So Cold-Hearted After All

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
March 24 2014 2:18 PM

Maybe Those Cold-Hearted Texts to the MH370 Families Weren't So Cold-Hearted After All

Relatives of passengers on Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 cry after hearing the news that the plane plunged into Indian Ocean at a hotel in Beijing on March 24, 2014

Photo by Goh Chai Hin/AFP/Getty Images

Here's Malaysia Airlines' side of the story regarding those text messages the airline sent to the families of the passengers on board missing Flight 370 shortly before Malaysia's prime minster announced that "all evidence" points to the fact that the jetliner plunged into the southern Indian Ocean, killing every one on board (emphasis mine):

Josh Voorhees Josh Voorhees

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 

It is with deep sadness that Malaysia Airlines earlier this evening had to confirm to the families of those on board Flight MH370 that it must now be assumed the flight had been lost. As the Prime Minister said, respect for the families is essential at this difficult time. And it is in that spirit that we informed the majority of the families in advance of the Prime Minister’s statement in person and by telephone. SMSs were used only as an additional means of communicating with the families. Those families have been at the heart of every action the company has taken since the flight disappeared on 8th March and they will continue to be so. When Malaysia Airlines receives approval from the investigating authorities, arrangements will be made to bring the families to the recovery area and until that time, we will continue to support the ongoing investigation.

The news of the text alerts broke shortly before Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak stepped to the podium late Monday night local time, and at first blush the SMS alerts appeared to be a rather cold-hearted way to break the news to families who have been waiting for more than two weeks to learn the fates of their loved ones. As the Washington Post put it shortly after the news broke: "Whatever the practical benefits of using a text message to inform families that their loved ones were thought to be dead, it seems likely this move may also be criticized." A quick scan of Twitter suggests that was an understatement.

In reality, however, the airline says the text alert (which you can see in full here) was only a secondary means of communication, presumably used in hopes of reaching any family members that either weren't around to be told in person or weren't answering their phones. "We wanted to ensure that families were informed via all channels," an airline spokesperson told Sky News earlier today. The airlines' logic appears to have been that a text message was better than no message at all.

I'll note that, as of now, we only really have the airlines' side of the story. That said, there's little to suggest that the company didn't reach out in person and over the phone as they say they did. About 30 minutes before the public announcement, for example, there were several reports that the families were being told to attend a briefing with officials. An early, pre-press conference CNN report on today's news, meanwhile, cited "a relative of a missing passenger briefed by the airline in Beijing."

At least a few relatives no doubt really did first learn the news via text—and I certainly won't go as far to argue this situation was handled perfectly—but I will say that it appears rather clear by now that the immediate handwringing and headlines were less than fair to the airline and to the actual timeline of events that took place late Monday night in Kuala Lumpur.

In an ideal world, of course, the sad news would have been delivered in person to each and every relative of all 239 passengers who boarded the missing jetliner—but, then again, in an ideal world those 239 passengers would have all arrived safely in Beijing back on March 8.

***Follow @JoshVoorhees and the rest of the @slatest team on Twitter.***

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 



Meet the New Bosses

How the Republicans would run the Senate.

The Government Is Giving Millions of Dollars in Electric-Car Subsidies to the Wrong Drivers

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Cheez-Its. Ritz. Triscuits.

Why all cracker names sound alike.

Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom

The Eye

This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059

Medical Examiner

Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?  

A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.

The Afghan Town With a Legitimately Good Tourism Pitch

A Futurama Writer on How the Vietnam War Shaped the Series

  News & Politics
Sept. 21 2014 11:34 PM People’s Climate March in Photos Hundreds of thousands of marchers took to the streets of NYC in the largest climate rally in history.
Business Insider
Sept. 20 2014 6:30 AM The Man Making Bill Gates Richer
Sept. 20 2014 7:27 AM How Do Plants Grow Aboard the International Space Station?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 21 2014 1:15 PM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 5  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Time Heist."
Sept. 21 2014 9:00 PM Attractive People Being Funny While Doing Amusing and Sometimes Romantic Things Don’t dismiss it. Friends was a truly great show.
Future Tense
Sept. 21 2014 11:38 PM “Welcome to the War of Tomorrow” How Futurama’s writers depicted asymmetrical warfare.
  Health & Science
The Good Word
Sept. 21 2014 11:44 PM Does This Name Make Me Sound High-Fat? Why it just seems so right to call a cracker “Cheez-It.”
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.