U.S. District Judge William Pauley has ruled the National Security Agency's phone surveillance legal, the Associated Press reports, citing the system as an effective method of counterterrorism. The New York federal judge, in a written statement, had this to say about his decision:
"The government learned from its mistake and adapted to confront a new enemy: a terror network capable of orchestrating attacks across the world. It launched a number of counter-measures, including a bulk telephony metadata collection program — a wide net that could find and isolate gossamer contacts among suspected terrorists in an ocean of seemingly disconnected data."
The New York Times also quotes Pauley as saying, “This blunt tool only works because it collects everything."
The ruling is a dismissal of a suit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union against NSA director James Clapper, and as noted by the Associated Press and Reuters, stands in stark contrast to a ruling from earlier this month by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, "who granted a preliminary injunction against the collecting of phone records of two men who had challenged the program. The Washington jurist said the program likely violates the U.S. Constitution's ban on unreasonable search."
As of right now, the ACLU has no comment. But at least some people are happy: "We are pleased with the decision," said Justice Department spokesman Peter Carr.
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.