Facebook Outs Invisible Users

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
Oct. 10 2013 9:49 PM

Facebook Outs Invisible Users

180285757
The logo of social networking website 'Facebook' displayed on a computer screen.

Photo by LEON NEAL/AFP/Getty Images

If you were on Facebook, but really just wanted to browse, not have others browse you, you could always opt out of making your profile searchable. The result was that you’d, more or less, have to swoop in and find friends, but someone you met at a party or meeting, couldn’t do the same to you. As of Wednesday, however, Facebook has lifted the invisibility cloak that it once provided.

The setting "Who can look up your Timeline by name?” which gave you the option to be unsearchable, began to be phased out last year. In typical “help me help you” Facebookese, last year’s announcement that you were losing the option to be unsearchable if you weren’t already using the function, came as part of the company’s “Better Controls for Managing Your Content” package of changes. Today, Facebook’s Chief Privacy Officer, announced that the function was being ditched completely, mostly because Facebook has given users so many other ways to find your material, that it’s basically useless anyway.

The setting was created when Facebook was a simple directory of profiles and it was very limited. For example, it didn’t prevent people from navigating to your Timeline by clicking your name in a story in News Feed, or from a mutual friend’s Timeline. Today, people can also search Facebook using Graph Search (for example, "People who live in Seattle,") making it even more important to control the privacy of the things you share rather than how people get to your Timeline.
Advertisement

Of course, the News Feed and Graph Search didn't always exist. And if you were still relying on not being searchable, then you probably weren't too thrilled about those two developments either. Facebook points out that this change probably doesn’t affect you because it’s only “a small percentage of people – in the single digits” that were still using it. Given the scale of Facebook these days, as Kashmir Hill over at Forbes points out, that still adds up to tens of millions of people.

But, as always, Facebook reminds those users unused to the light of day on the social network that “to quickly control who can find posts you shared in the past, visit the privacy settings page. With one click, you can limit the audience of posts you’ve shared in the past.” The announcement also offers these three reminders for the recently unveiled:

To further control what people see across the site:
1. Share each post with the people you want to be able to see it. You control this every time you post.
2. Use Activity Log to review individual things you’ve already shared. Here you can delete things you may not want to appear on Facebook anymore, untag photos and change the privacy of past posts.
3. Ask friends and others to remove anything they may have shared about you that you don’t want on the site. You can do this by reaching out to the person directly, or using the reporting feature, also available in Activity Log.

Is it easier to understand what’s what? Perhaps. But is it so time consuming that more options more of the time merely creates the illusion of privacy? Depends on your commitment to getting back off the grid.

TODAY IN SLATE

Doublex

Crying Rape

False rape accusations exist, and they are a serious problem.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

I Bought the Huge iPhone. I’m Already Thinking of Returning It.

The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B

How Will You Carry Around Your Huge New iPhone? Apple Pants!

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.

Television

The Other Huxtable Effect

Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.

Lifetime Didn’t Find the Steubenville Rape Case Dramatic Enough. So They Added a Little Self-Immolation.

No, New York Times, Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman” 

Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 1:39 PM Shonda Rhimes Is Not an “Angry Black Woman,” New York Times. Neither Are Her Characters.
Behold
Sept. 19 2014 1:11 PM An Up-Close Look at the U.S.–Mexico Border
  News & Politics
Politics
Sept. 19 2014 6:22 PM Blacks Don’t Have a Corporal Punishment Problem Americans do. But when blacks exhibit the same behaviors as others, it becomes part of a greater black pathology. 
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 19 2014 6:35 PM Pabst Blue Ribbon is Being Sold to the Russians, Was So Over Anyway
  Life
Inside Higher Ed
Sept. 19 2014 1:34 PM Empty Seats, Fewer Donors? College football isn’t attracting the audience it used to.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 19 2014 4:48 PM You Should Be Listening to Sbtrkt
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 19 2014 5:09 PM Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?   A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.