The New York Times brings us news of a growing problem in the world of Supreme Court opinions: "link rot," a term coined to describe hyperlinks used to cite online material that vanish or change beyond recognition over time.
The top-line takeaway from the Harvard research the paper cites is rather remarkable: roughly half of the 555 links used in opinions by the court since 1996 no longer lead to the material actually cited by the justices in their written opinions. (That revelations would be a whole lot more surprising if we weren't talking about a group that admits it hasn't quite figured out the whole email thing just yet.)
You can find the Harvard draft report here, and the Times story on it here. But perhaps the best way way to illustrate the problem is with the rather (intentonally) hilarious "404 error" message that resides at a hyperlinked address found in a 2011 Supreme Court opinion penned by Justice Samuel Alito Jr.:
Head on over to Times for a handful of other examples of SCOTUS hyperlinking gone wrong.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Democrats’ War at Home
How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?
Why Time Is on Our Side in the Fight Against Ebola
The Religious Right Is Not Happy With Republicans
Catacombs Where You Can Stroll Down Hallways Lined With Corpses
Homeland Is Good Again! For Now.
How White Boy Rick, a legendary Detroit cocaine dealer, helped the FBI uncover brazen police corruption.
How Even an Old Hipster Can Age Gracefully
On their new albums, Leonard Cohen, Robert Plant, and Loudon Wainwright III show three ways.