Going Solo in Syria Is Big Shift for Obama

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
Aug. 31 2013 1:20 PM

Obama Could Be First in Decades To Attack Foreign Nation Without International Backing

Hundreds of people protest against military intervention in Syria in central London on August 31

Photo by CARL COURT/AFP/Getty Images

It seems President Obama isn’t afraid of going at it alone. And that, in itself, marks a big shift for a man who, during his first presidential run, emphasized how the United States needed to build coalitions and alliances across the world. Now, Obama could very well become the first president in three decades to launch an attack on a foreign nation without first gathering broad international support or to directly defend Americans, points out the Associated Press. The last time the United States was this alone in pursuing a foreign strike was in 1983, when President Ronald Reagan launched the Grenada invasion.

Obama’s apparent willingness to launch an attack on Syria virtually alone “has left some members of his party and former administration officials disappointed,” points out the Wall Street Journal. The president has made it clear he’d rather have international support, but spoke recently of what appeared to be the “incapacity” of the United Nations to do something “in the face of a clear violation of international norms.”


And while it seems that France is the only real ally the United States has on Syria, that doesn’t mean others haven’t been pushing for action behind the scenes. South Korean, Turkish, Israeli, and Saudi officials have been pushing Obama to respond to Syria’s apparent use of chemical weapons, according to the Journal. It’s not just about Syria, these allies argue. If Washington doesn’t act now it could have a detrimental effect on the U.S. credibility on Iran and other areas of the world. Instead, a strike, even if a symbolic one, would at least send a message that the United States won’t back down on its security commitments around the world.

Daniel Politi has been contributing to Slate since 2004 and wrote the "Today's Papers" column from 2006 to 2009. You can follow him on Twitter @dpoliti.


War Stories

The Right Target

Why Obama’s airstrikes against ISIS may be more effective than people expect.

The Only Good Thing That Happened at Today’s Soul-Crushing U.N. Climate Talks

It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is

I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights

Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.

Should You Recline Your Seat? Two Economists Weigh In.


It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.

Building a Better Workplace

In Defense of HR

Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.

Why Is This Mother in Prison for Helping Her Daughter Get an Abortion?

How Ted Cruz and Scott Brown Misunderstand What It Means to Be an American Citizen

  News & Politics
Sept. 23 2014 6:06 PM Nothing to See Here The one national holiday Republicans want you to forget.
Sept. 23 2014 2:08 PM Home Depot’s Former Lead Security Engineer Had a Legacy of Sabotage
Sept. 23 2014 1:57 PM Would a Second Sarkozy Presidency End Marriage Equality in France?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 23 2014 2:32 PM Politico Asks: Why Is Gabby Giffords So “Ruthless” on Gun Control?
  Slate Plus
Political Gabfest
Sept. 23 2014 3:04 PM Chicago Gabfest How to get your tickets before anyone else.
Brow Beat
Sept. 23 2014 4:45 PM Why Is Autumn the Only Season With Two Names?
Future Tense
Sept. 23 2014 5:36 PM This Climate Change Poem Moved World Leaders to Tears Today
  Health & Science
Sept. 23 2014 4:33 PM Who Deserves Those 4 Inches of Airplane Seat Space? An investigation into the economics of reclining.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.