Police Investigate Claims the Military Killed Diana

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
Aug. 18 2013 11:00 AM

Scotland Yard Is “Assessing” Allegations That Military Was Involved in Princess Diana’s Death

Picture dated 14 November 1992 of Princess Diana leaving the first anti-AIDS bookshop in Paris

Photo by VINCENT AMALVY/AFP/Getty Images

UPDATE: The Sunday People reports the police are investigating claims that the elite British Special Air Service—or SAS—was behind the deaths of Princess Diana and her boyfriend Dodi Al Fayed. The paper says it saw a seven-page handwritten letter by the parents-in-law of a special forces sniper, who is never named, claiming he had boasted to his wife that the SAS “was behind Princess Diana’s death.” On Sunday, a former head of Royal Protection said he was mystified by the new claims, insisting the deaths were “an accident by any definition,” reports the Telegraph.

Original post: British police acknowledged Saturday that detectives are examining new information they received on the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Al Fayed. London’s Metropolitan Police emphasized that “this is not a re-investigation” into the 1997 deaths. Rather, police are “scoping” the details of the information and “assessing its relevance and credibility,” according to a statement.

The police refuses to reveal any details of this new information or where it came from, although there are reports that a member of the British military may have been responsible for the deaths, according to Sky News. Reports claim it was the Royal Military Police that passed on this new info to the London police and reportedly includes a reference to the Special Air Service, known as SAS, notes the Telegraph. Sky News hears word the information was passed on to police by the parents-in-law of a former soldier.


Scotland Yard emphasized that this new assessment of evidence “does not come under Operation Paget,” as the investigation into conspiracy theories that Diana and her boyfriend were murdered is known, points out the BBC. A 2006 report found that there was no evidence the couple was murdered. Then in 2008, a jury ruled that the couple was killed due to the “grossly negligent driving” of their driver as well as the paparazzi chasing them.

Daniel Politi has been contributing to Slate since 2004 and wrote the "Today's Papers" column from 2006 to 2009. You can follow him on Twitter @dpoliti.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 8:15 AM Ted Cruz Will Not Join a Protest of "The Death of Klinghoffer" After All
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 9:03 AM My Father Was James Brown. I Watched Him Beat My Mother. And Then I Found Myself With Someone Like Dad.
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 8:27 AM Only Science Fiction Can Save Us! What sci-fi gets wrong about income inequality.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 7:30 AM Ring Around the Rainbow
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.