Not Even the Guardian's "Republican" Blinders Will Let You Avoid Royal-Baby News

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
July 22 2013 10:17 AM

Not Even the Guardian's "Republican" Blinders Will Let You Avoid Royal-Baby News Today

As the comment section of this (or any other post dealing with the royal baby) will likely prove: Today, the day the Duchess of Cambridge is in labor at a London hospital, the Internet is made up of two types of people. There are those who are interested in the news of Britain's likely future king or queen, and those who want no part of the media circus that is dominating the news cycle in the United States and United Kingdom. Unfortunately for those of you who count yourself among the latter group, there are few places to hide from the soon-to-be newest member of Britain's royal family—and the Internet certainly isn't one of them.

Enter the U.K.'s Guardian, which is offering readers a chance to put on royal blinders in the form of a "Republican" button on its homepage that, in theory anyway, filters out all references to Will, Kate and the rest of the royal clan. Here it is in action, first up the Guardian homepage you'll see upon arriving at the site:

Royalist
Advertisement

And then what happens if you opt for the Republican option by clicking the toggle in the upper right hand corner. (For those unfamiliar with the term as used in Britain, it generally describes those who support a republic or representative-based form of government without a monarch as its head; it doesn't refer to the U.S. political party of the same name):

Republican

Of course, if you scroll down a little further you'll see that there truly is no escaping Prince William and the Duchess of Cambridge's offspring on this day. Declaring yourself a Republican as opposed to a Royalist will spare you headlines like "Royal birth poses style challenge" but it still won't create a monarch-free world. (Royal baby stories are also dominating the site's Most Viewed and Latest boxes.)

Nevermind

***Follow @JoshVoorhees and the rest of the @slatest team on Twitter.***

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

The Extraordinary Amicus Brief That Attempts to Explain the Wu-Tang Clan to the Supreme Court Justices

Amazon Is Officially a Gadget Company. Here Are Its Six New Devices.

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Altered State

The Plight of the Pre-Legalization Marijuana Offender

What should happen to weed users and dealers busted before the stuff was legal?

Surprise! The Women Hired to Fix the NFL Think the NFL Is Just Great.

You Shouldn’t Spank Anyone but Your Consensual Sex Partner

Moneybox
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM The Most Awkward Scenario in Which a Man Can Hold a Door for a Woman
  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Outward
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 7:23 PM MIT Researchers Are Using Smartphones to Interact With Other Screens
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 11:18 AM A Bridge Across the Sky
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.