After four years in which more than 300 drone strike killed some 2,500 people, President Obama and his team thought it was finally time to develop some actual, written-down rules on when the United States could kill someone. And what led them to this conclusion? Could it have been a recognition that perhaps there was something troubling about the widening net of suspects deemed eligible for murder by the U.S. government? Not really. They were just worried somebody else was going to make the decisions. “There was concern that the levers might no longer be in our hands,” an official tells the New York Times.
Not to worry, the policy is still being written, but now that Obama won four more years at the White House it will be “finished at a mare leisurely pace,” points out the Times. Although the administration usually presents itself as of one mind when it comes to drone policy, the truth is that there’s lots of internal debate. This is particularly true when considering that while drones were once used solely to target known terrorist leaders with clear plans to attack the United States, now strikes sometimes target groups of unidentified fighters. Partly out of concern that the United States is setting precedent for other countries on the issue, the United Nations is set to open up a unit in Geneva to investigate drone strikes early next year.
TODAY IN SLATE
Black people’s disdain for “proper English” and academic achievement is a myth.
Hong Kong’s Protesters Are Ridiculously Polite. That’s What Scares Beijing So Much.
The One Fact About Ebola That Should Calm You: It Spreads Slowly
How White Boy Rick, a legendary Detroit cocaine dealer, helped the FBI uncover brazen police corruption.
A Jaw-Dropping Political Ad Aimed at Young Women, Apparently
How Even an Old Hipster Can Age Gracefully
On their new albums, Leonard Cohen, Robert Plant, and Loudon Wainwright III show three ways.