Americans Win Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
Oct. 10 2012 9:59 AM

And the Nobel Prize in Chemistry Goes to ... Biomedicine?

Pictures of US scientists Robert Lefkowitz (L) and Brian Kobilka projected on a screen as the prize committee anounces the winners Wendesday

Photo by Jonathan Nackstrand/AFP/GettyImages.

American biomedical researchers Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Kobilka were awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry today for their groundbreaking work on G-protein-coupled receptors.

Josh Voorhees Josh Voorhees

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. 

What the heck are those? The Associated Press explains:

About half of all medications act on these receptors, including beta blockers and antihistamines, so learning about them will help scientists to come up with better drugs. The human body has about 1,000 kinds of such receptors, structures on the surface of cells, which let the body respond to a wide variety of chemical signals, like adrenaline. Some receptors are in the nose, tongue and eyes, and let us sense smells, tastes and light.

Lefkowitz works at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Duke University Medical Center, where the 69-year-old is a professor. Kobilka, 57, used to work under Lefkowitz at Duke before leaving for Stanford University School of Medicine, where he is now a professor. You can read the official Nobel announcement here.

It's worth pointing out that it wouldn't be a stretch to say that this year's chemistry award winners actually did their groundbreaking work in biology—something that continues a recent trend when it comes to the Nobel Prize. In 2009, the award went to a trio of scientists who discovered the function of the ribosome, a part of the cell that builds proteins; in 2006 the prize went to a biochemist who figured out how DNA is read; and in 2003 it went to a pair of researchers who discovered how cells shuttle salts and water through a cell membrane.

Slate contributor Geoff Brumfiel, who is also a physics reporter for Nature, summed things up like so this morning via Twitter: "Chemistry is everywhere! (Except in this year's #chemistry #Nobel.)"

Unlike with the prizes in physics and medicine, Slate's family and friends failed to accurately predict who and what would win the chemistry award. You can see the rest of Slate's Nobel prize predictions here. Next up tomorrow: Literature.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.