Front Pages Quiet on Debate Winners, Losers

Your News Companion by Ben Mathis-Lilley
Oct. 4 2012 9:35 AM

Today's Front Pages: Headline Writers Avoid Calling a Winner

As we explained late last night pundits wasted little time scoring Wednesday's debate a clear-cut win for Mitt Romney. But a quick scan of the morning's front pages shows that—fortunately for President Obama—the nation's headline writers and art team largely avoided specifics in the hours between when the debate ended and when Thursday's editions went to press.

As you'll see there was the occasional talk of a "Romney doing well; Obama didn't err," but that type of punditry was largely relegated to subheads. A typical bold-faced headline, meanwhile, involved the two men "sparring," "clashing" or "debating."

Advertisement

Here's a small sampling from swing states around the country (via the Newseum, which has plenty more for you to look at here).

We'll start with the exception to the rule, the Denver Post, which called round one for Romney:

1349356661555

Many of the Post's print brethren, however, went the he-said/he-said route. The Des Moines Register:

1349356732433

The St. Louis Dispatch:

1349356805387

The Las Vegas Review-Journal:

1349356874608

The Charlotte Observer:

1349356943264

The Cincinnati Inquirer:

1349356999369

The Richmond Times-Dispatch:

1349357064430

The Miami Herald:

1349357170760

And, for comparison, the Wall Street Journal:

1349357535763

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City. Follow him on Twitter.