New York Times Discovers Fashionable Alternative to Manbags: "The Backpack"

Things! Men have them, and they need to be carried. Possibly an iPad? Some sunscreen. Battery chargers. Identification. A bottle of water. If the men were women, they could put these things in their purses. But men are not women. A nice bag with one strap is a purse, really, isn't it? Even if you try to butch or prole it up by calling it a " messenger bag ." And purses, as everyone knows , are vaginas. What to do? T magazine, the New York Times' fashion publication, has your answer :

A perfect, casual counterpoint to the borrowed-from-the-ladies man bags of recent years, the backpack was seen harnessed all over the fall runways, in both familiar interpretations (Louis Vuitton and Buckler rediscovered the expedition-worthy rucksack) and new ones (Prada’s acidic camouflage, for starters). Here, we offer two approaches in introducing one to your dress: either as a Japanese street-wear take on Americana or a nod to the backpack’s athletic past (complemented by the aforementioned sweat shirt — now with short sleeves! — and an elevated track pant).

Carry your things in...a bag made for carrying things! With two straps, one for each brawny shoulder. Lanvin makes one for $1,795, according to the Times. (Vogue says it's $1,693 .) It looks nice and roomy. You can probably fit your $220 ax into it, if you leave the end of the painted handle sticking out.

Want more of your favorite content on the MSN homepage?
Try the news, sports or entertainment editons.