Ex-gay conversion therapy. Jury finds JONAH guilty of fraud.

Jury Finds Ex-Gay Conversion Therapists Guilty of Fraud in Landmark Decision

Jury Finds Ex-Gay Conversion Therapists Guilty of Fraud in Landmark Decision

Outward has moved! You can find new stories here.
Outward
Expanding the LGBTQ Conversation
June 25 2015 4:14 PM

Jury Finds Ex-Gay Conversion Therapists Guilty of Fraud in Landmark Decision

sigmund_freud_life
Freud would no doubt have some interesting insights into JONAH's "therapists."

Photo by Max Halberstadt, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

A New Jersey jury convicted an ex-gay therapy nonprofit of consumer fraud on Thursday in the first ever ruling of its kind. A group of gay men brought the lawsuit, alleging that the ex-gay nonprofit and its therapists—Jews Offering New Alternatives for Healing, or JONAH—committed fraud when it claimed it could it could turn gay people straight. A six-person jury agreed, finding that JONAH’s advertisements, claims, and practices were illegal under New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act.

Perhaps the most monumental aspect of the verdict, however, is the jury’s decision that ex-gay therapy itself qualifies as “unconscionable” business practice. In other words, JONAH didn’t just break that law by asserting (falsely) that it could alter sexual orientation. It also broke the law by coercing its clients into bizarre activities in an effort to turn them straight. This finding is unprecedented—but it’s not particularly surprising. As I explained in February, JONAH’s methods of converting its clients to heterosexuality were startling, to say the least:

In one group activity, clients held hands to create a human chain while one person stood behind the chain holding two oranges, meant to represent testicles. Clients then took turns standing on the other side of the chain while the rest of the group shouted anti-gay slurs at them. The goal was to goad clients into pushing through the chain and grabbing the oranges. At one particularly atrocious session, a counselor instructed Levin to select someone from the group to role-play his past abuser. The selected participant was made to yell abusive statements that Levin’s abuser had made, such as “I won’t love you anymore if you don’t give me blowjobs.”
Individual sessions were just as disturbing. Downing appears to have asked most of his clients to undress while he watched. He also instructed at least one client to beat an effigy of his mother with a tennis racket while screaming, as if murdering her. Another JONAH counselor told a client to wear a rubber band around his wrist and snap it every time he felt attraction to a man. And JONAH counselors frequently told their clients to go to bathhouses with their fathers in order to be naked in their presence.
Advertisement

The Southern Poverty Law Center, which represented JONAH’s former patients, will now ask the judge to issue an injunction against JONAH, forbidding it from continuing to “convert” its clients. And now that it has won its case against JONAH, the SPLC will likely look to litigate against ex-gay therapists elsewhere. Every state, as well as the federal government, has a law barring fraudulent or misleading advertisement. Ex-gay therapy bans may be stalling in the states. But the mere threat of a major lawsuit could push many ex-gay groups to close up shop before they wind up defending their “treatments” in court. 

Mark Joseph Stern is a writer for Slate. He covers the law and LGBTQ issues.