That New “52 Percent Oppose Gay Marriage” Number You’re Hearing Is Misleading

Expanding the LGBTQ Conversation
May 19 2014 3:51 PM

Politico’s New Gay Marriage Poll Report Means Little

A same-sex marriage supporter demonstrates at the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty Images

If you haven’t heard it already, you will soon: A new poll found that 52 percent of people surveyed oppose gay marriage. For those that have been following this particular number on the national level for the past few years, a majority on the opposition side will come as a surprise; most recent polls have shown that as many as 58 percent of Americans favor marriage equality. What changed?

As it happens, nothing. The trouble is that the new poll, published by Politico, draws from such a limited and specific sample size as to be meaningless on the national level. To be fair, the article reveals in the last paragraph that the responses came from “867 likely voters between May 2 and 13, in places with highly competitive midterm contests.” But this is really the headline and not, as printed, “Generational divide of gay marriage, pot.” As David Badash over at the New Civil Rights Movement points out in his critique, “those areas include 16 conservative states—for Senate races—and 68 districts—for House races. That’s 84 separate areas polled, or just over 10 people per area on average.”


In other words, we’re talking about the opinions of a few people in areas that mostly skew conservative anyway—not very telling. But skimming the report (or worse, just overhearing the headline), it would be easy to miss that crucial caveat and conclude that the poll actually spoke for Americans in general. This is not the case; if actual trends continue, support for marriage equality in the United States will only strengthen over time. 

J. Bryan Lowder is a Slate assistant editor. He writes and edits for Outward, Slate’s LGBTQ section, and for the culture section.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

Yes, Black Families Tend to Spank More. That Doesn’t Mean It’s Good for Black Kids.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 6:30 PM Nothing Succeeds Like Secession Breakaway movements across the United States want to get on the Scottish bandwagon. 
Sept. 16 2014 2:35 PM Germany’s Nationwide Ban on Uber Lasted All of Two Weeks
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 6:23 PM Bryan Cranston Reenacts Baseball’s Best Moments to Promote the Upcoming Postseason
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 1:48 PM Why We Need a Federal Robotics Commission
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 8:41 PM You’re Cut, Adrian Peterson Why fantasy football owners should release the Minnesota Vikings star.