Uber Will Cap Price Surges During Emergencies

A blog about business and economics.
July 8 2014 4:45 PM

Uber Will Cap Price Surges During Emergencies

451565450-in-this-photo-illustration-the-new-smart-phone-taxi-app
Uber's phone app.

Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images

Uber has agreed to drop one of its most controversial policies when disaster strikes. New York state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced this afternoon that the ride-sharing company known for adjusting fares based on demand—a model known as dynamic pricing—will cap its price surges during emergencies to comply with a New York law against price gouging in times of need. Schneiderman said in a statement that Uber will adopt a similar policy nationwide.

The relevant New York law was passed in the winter of 1978-79 in order to protect consumers from rising oil prices. In general, it aims to prevent merchants from imposing extreme price hikes during an "abnormal disruption of the market" caused by "extraordinary adverse circumstances":

For purposes of this section, the phrase "abnormal disruption of the market" shall mean any change in the market, whether actual or imminently threatened, resulting from stress of weather, convulsion of nature, failure or shortage of electric power or other source of energy, strike, civil disorder, war, military action, national or local emergency, or other cause of an abnormal disruption of the market which results in the declaration of a state of emergency by the governor.
Advertisement

Uber will not totally eliminate dynamic pricing during emergencies but will instead cap how high its rates can go based on what it charged consumers over the previous two months. The agreement between Uber and the AG's office states that if Uber employs price surging during an "abnormal disruption of the market" it will go no higher than the fourth-highest price charged in the area (all on different days) over the past 60 days. So if Uber's highest surges were 5X, 4.25X, 3.75X, and 2.5X in that period, it could charge no more than 2.5X during the emergency.

Of course none of this has any bearing on Uber's pricing practices during non-emergency times. That means you might still get stuck with a $100 bill on a snowy Friday night—and that's OK. Uber's dynamic pricing practices are generally a great way of bringing demand for car services in line with supply. But in case a hurricane devastates Manhattan or aliens invade the Financial District, one thing you won't have to worry about is the price of that Uber ride home.

Alison Griswold is a Slate staff writer covering business and economics.

 

TODAY IN SLATE

Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

My Year as an Abortion Doula       

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 9:22 AM The Most Populist Campaign of 2014
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 16 2014 10:17 AM How Jack Ma Founded Alibaba
  Life
Atlas Obscura
Sept. 16 2014 8:00 AM The Wall Street Bombing: Low-Tech Terrorism in Prohibition-era New York
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 9:13 AM Clive James, Terminally Ill, Has Written an Exquisitely Resigned Farewell Poem
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 7:36 AM The Inspiration Drought Why our science fiction needs new dreams.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 16 2014 7:30 AM A Galaxy of Tatooines
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.