The Government's Going to Make a Profit on the Fannie/Freddie Bailout

A blog about business and economics.
Feb. 21 2014 9:54 AM

The Government's Going to Make a Profit on the Fannie/Freddie Bailout

Giant puppets always win.

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

At the depths of the economic downturn, the federal government nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and continued to make good on their debt obligations via a tremendously expensive and broadly unpopular bailout. But as things calmed down and the housing market started to recover, Fannie and Freddie turned profitable and have been kicking those profits back to the Treasury as dividends. In its latest report, Fannie Mae says it earned $84 billion in 2013, and as Nick Timiraos points out, this means the Treasury will soon be in the black on the bailout:

Something to note here is that the precise semantics of this situation matter. Post-bankruptcy Fannie Mae continues to be a publicly traded company, and various vulture funds own those shares. The shareholders' preferred characterization of the situation is that the bailout Fannie received was a kind of loan and that these dividends constitute "paying back" the loan. When the "loan" is fully "paid off" the shareholders feel that they should have first claim on Fannie's ongoing value as an enterprise.


The Treasury Department—rightly—entirely rejects this analysis. As a matter of law, Fannie was taken "into conservatorship" because it was bankrupt. At that point, shares in Fannie Mae ceased to have any value. Since entering conservatorship, Fannie has both received bailout funds and paid dividends to the Treasury. But nothing has been repaid because there is no loan, and buying up the post-conservatorship shares of Fannie doesn't entitle you to anything.

That said, while it's fun to debate the metaphysics of the situation, what actually matters is Congress. Congress is going to do something about Fannie and Freddie eventually, and it is entirely within the power of Congress to "do something" that gives Fannie and Freddie shareholders an undeserved windfall. So watch out.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 7:30 AM Ring Around the Rainbow
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.