Robots Have Been Taking Our Restaurant Jobs for More Than 100 Years

A blog about business and economics.
Jan. 14 2014 4:15 PM

Restaurant Automation Has Been Eliminating Human Labor for a Century

More machine than restaurant.

Photo by Rainier Ehrhardt/Getty Images

Matt Novak has a great post about how 1989's Back to the Future Part II sparked some press excitement about automation in the fast-food sector. Bottom line, "a McDonald's filled with nothing but robot workers felt just as close (and inevitable) in 1989."

I would actually extend the point quite a bit. It was way back in 1912 that the first Horn & Hardardt automat came to New York City. The idea of these restaurants wasn't to completely eliminate human labor, but it was to sharply cut back on it. No waiters or waitresses. Not even any cashiers. You would, in effect, get your meal from a vending machine. A modern day fast-food restaurant is actually more labor intensive than that, not less, despite the technological progress over the past century.

One key reason for this is that the food service industry operates across a whole wide range of different market segments. Generally speaking, higher-end dining is more labor-intensive than lower-end dining and all forms of food away from home are more labor-intensive than heating up a frozen dinner at home. So when some particular segment of the food service industry changes, the overall composition of Americans' dining habits also shifts. Which is to say that if Chili's figures out how to get by with less human labor, therefore reducing costs, people might respond to lower prices by eating more meals at Chili's and fewer meals at McDonald's. But even this new, less labor-intensive version of Chili's might still be more labor-intensive than a McDonald's.


In other words, over the decades we didn't just get more-and-more automation in our automats—we got whole new dining formats.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 10:36 AM MacArthur Fellow Alison Bechdel Recounts Telling Her Mother About Her Best-Selling Memoir MacArthur Fellow Alison Bechdel recounts telling her mother about her best-selling memoir.
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 9:03 AM My Father Was James Brown. I Watched Him Beat My Mother. And Then I Found Myself With Someone Like Dad.
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 8:27 AM Only Science Fiction Can Save Us! What sci-fi gets wrong about income inequality.
  Health & Science
Sept. 17 2014 10:20 AM White People Are Fine With Laws That Harm Blacks The futility of fighting criminal justice racism with statistics.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.