Charitable donations driven by number killed, not by the number of survivors.

Don't Make This Mistake When Donating to Charity

Moneybox
A blog about business and economics.
Sept. 25 2013 3:39 PM

A Huge Mistake People Make When Giving to Charity

181785264
Pakistani earthquake survivors sit near their collapsed mud house in the earthquake-devastated district of Awaran on Sept. 25, 2013.

Photo by Banaras Khan/AFP/Getty Images

It's well-known that spectacular natural disasters tend to do a better job of stimulating charitable giving than long-simmering catastrophes like malaria infections or simple day-to-day grinding rural poverty. An via Tyler Cowen, an interesting paper that finds a bias within the bias toward catastrophism—donations are strongly correlated with the number of people who died in a disaster, and once you control for death, they're uncorrelated with the number of survivors.

But obviously while it's tragic for people to die in an earthquake, the dead people don't need your help. The people who need help are the people who are still alive but left in need of shelter, medical attention, safe drinking water, and food. In some sense a disaster with a high death toll is also likely to have a high level of survivor need. But it's a very imperfect proxy, and both the giving public and the media could try to do a better job of not anchoring on the death toll.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

  News & Politics
Politics
March 31 2015 5:00 AM How the Founder of the Fugees Became a Big-Time Political Donor Without Anyone Knowing The musical artist chose to fund a super PAC through opaque, legal, and increasingly popular means.
  Slate Plus
Working
March 30 2015 11:32 AM The “How Does a U.N. Official Work?” Transcript What’s it like to manage the U.N.’s Ebola response? Read a transcript of Adam Davidson’s conversation with the assistant secretary-general for field support.