Yesterday Republicans in the House of Representatives finally got their ducks in a row and voted to cut $40 billion from SNAP, the program that gives food assistance to poor people.
Rory Cooper from Eric Cantor's office had a curious reaction to this:
.@PressSec says Food Stamp reforms takes food out of the mouths of the hungry. Blatantly false fearmongering. Shameful.— Rory Cooper (@rorycooper) September 19, 2013
The fact is there's nothing false about this. Read Dottie Rosenbaum, Stacy Dean, and Robert Greenstein from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities on this if you're interested. Their report is titled "Cuts in House Leadership SNAP Proposal Would Affect Millions of Low-Income Americans" but it's hard to know what Cooper is even trying to say here. Obviously, when you reduce spending on a program to give food assistant to low-income Americans you end up hurting low-income incomes.
But what's particularly egregious about this bill is that the poor-kicking aspect of it isn't just part of a general austerity regime. SNAP benefits are normally funded alongside farm subsidies as part of a consolidated "farm bill." And low and behold Republicans managed to find plenty of room in the budget to funnel money at farm owners. Spending is being cut only on the poor.
TODAY IN SLATE
Slate Plus Early Read: The Self-Made Man
The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.
Mitt Romney May Be Weighing a 2016 Run. That Would Be a Big Mistake.
Amazing Photos From Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution
Transparent Is the Fall’s Only Great New Show
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada
Now, journalists can't even say her name.
Lena Dunham, the Book
More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.