Yesterday Republicans in the House of Representatives finally got their ducks in a row and voted to cut $40 billion from SNAP, the program that gives food assistance to poor people.
Rory Cooper from Eric Cantor's office had a curious reaction to this:
.@PressSec says Food Stamp reforms takes food out of the mouths of the hungry. Blatantly false fearmongering. Shameful.— Rory Cooper (@rorycooper) September 19, 2013
The fact is there's nothing false about this. Read Dottie Rosenbaum, Stacy Dean, and Robert Greenstein from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities on this if you're interested. Their report is titled "Cuts in House Leadership SNAP Proposal Would Affect Millions of Low-Income Americans" but it's hard to know what Cooper is even trying to say here. Obviously, when you reduce spending on a program to give food assistant to low-income Americans you end up hurting low-income incomes.
But what's particularly egregious about this bill is that the poor-kicking aspect of it isn't just part of a general austerity regime. SNAP benefits are normally funded alongside farm subsidies as part of a consolidated "farm bill." And low and behold Republicans managed to find plenty of room in the budget to funnel money at farm owners. Spending is being cut only on the poor.
TODAY IN SLATE
More Than Scottish Pride
What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture
Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You
Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows
Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?
The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.
Happy Constitution Day!
Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.