I wrote recently about the factors driving CEO pay seem driven more by convention than any concrete reality. For another example of that which has nothing to do with anyone being overpaid, check out this Wall Street Journal story about "Stung by Falling Prices, Mining Companies Take Ax to CEO Pay" and ask yourself what kind of sense that makes.
Is it supposed to be the fault of a particular mining company's executive team that the global commodities market is down? Obviously not. All businesses are simply to some extent victims of forces beyond their control. Hitting a soft patch in the world market for your product isn't the same thing as bad management. But what is true is that with commodity prices down, mining companies have less money. With less money in hand, they pay their CEOs less. It's easy to understand how that happens, but it's very different from any kind of rational assessment of management performance.
TODAY IN SLATE
Ford’s Big Gamble
It’s completely transforming America’s best-selling vehicle.
Should the United States Grant Asylum to Victims of Domestic Violence?
The Apple Watch Will Make Everyone Around You Just a Little Worse Off
This Was the First Object Ever Designed
Don’t Expect Adrian Peterson to Go to Prison
In much of America, beating your kids is perfectly legal.
How the Apple Watch Will Annoy Us
A glowing screen attached to someone else’s wrist is shinier than all but the blingiest jewels.
A Little Bit Softer Now, a Little Bit Softer Now …
The sad, gradual decline of the fade-out in popular music.