Guns vs Butter

A blog about business and economics.
July 3 2013 10:33 AM

Guns vs Butter—Crowding In, Crowding Out, and World War II

fredgraph

A classic economic example of tradeoffs on the production possibility frontier is "guns vs butter"—a government that wants to produce more armaments is going to need to produce less consumer goods such as butter. The example takes that specific form, I believer, because the United Kingdom had a very severe butter rationing regime during World War I. But playing around with FRED's great historical data yesterday I noticed something funny. As Europe went to war in 1939 and the United States started arming itself butter consumption actually went up not down.

That turns it into a nice example of a totally different economic phenomenon—"crowding in" due to effective fiscal and monetary stimulus. The Great Depression and the recession-within-a-Depression of 1937 had left the country with enough excess capacity for both guns and butter.

Advertisement

And yet the dream of buttery plenitude was not to last. Pearl Harbor was bombed in December of 1941 and as the United States entered the war excess capacity completely dried up as more and more resources were put into war production. "By Christmas of 1942 a serious shortage of butter and other fats had developed" and throughout 1943 and 1944 butter was rationed at home to make sure everyone got a little with plenty left over for the troops.

So there you have it. As a simple rule of thumb guns-vs-butter and tradeoffs works. In the long term, if you keep making more and more guns you'll end up with less butter. But the reality is more complicated. Sometimes war production can stimulate butter production. Rather tragically, the FRED dataseries on this ends in September of 1941. I'd love to see how actual consumption fared during the rationing period and especially what happened in 1945 when the war was still going but rationing was lifted.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Amazon Is Launching a Serious Run at Apple and Samsung

Television

Slim Pickings at the Network TV Bazaar

Three talented actresses in three terrible shows.

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

The Ungodly Horror of Having a Bug Crawl Into Your Ear and Scratch Away at Your Eardrum

We Could Fix Climate Change for Free. Now There’s Just One Thing Holding Us Back.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 7:03 PM Once Again, a Climate Policy Hearing Descends Into Absurdity
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Outward
Sept. 17 2014 6:53 PM LGBTQ Luminaries Honored With MacArthur “Genius” Fellowships
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 8:25 PM A New Song and Music Video From Angel Olsen, Indie’s Next Big Thing
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 9:00 PM Amazon Is Now a Gadget Company
  Health & Science
Jurisprudence
Sept. 17 2014 4:49 PM Schooling the Supreme Court on Rap Music Is it art or a true threat of violence?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?