Pay Players Less So Owners Get Richer?

A blog about business and economics.
April 15 2013 1:42 PM

What's the Alternative To Sky-High Salaries for Baseball Players?

Detroit Tigers pitcher Justin Verlander

Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images

With due respect to Edward McClelland's concerns about high compensation for baseball players and growing wage inequality in the United States, it's not clear to me what the alternative system that would be better from an egalitarian viewpoint is supposed to be. What if Congress passed a law saying no player can earn more than $5 million a year?

The quality of baseball play would stay similar. The number of people who want to attend games live would stay similar. The pool of tickets for sale would stay similar. The market-clearing price of tickets would stay high, as would the profit-maximizing price of in-game concessions. The number of people wanting to watch games on TV would stay similar, so the auction process by which TV rights are sold would stay similar. In other words, no benefits would trickle down to baseball fans. The benefit of lower salaries would trickle up to baseball team owners. And whatever you think of Justin Verlander, it's not at all clear to me how putting more money in the pocket of Tigers owner (and Little Caeser's Pizza founder) Mike Ilitch improves anything.


A relevant issue here is that in a lot of lines of business, higher profit margins will spur new investments. If the wages for Chicago-area homebuilders fall, then profits will soar, leading to more home construction and thus a consumer benefit—more homes. But if the wages for Chicago-area baseball players fall, then it's still the Cubs and the White Sox and a 162-game season. Why exactly Congress has decided to allow major American sports leagues to constitute themselves as closed cartels rather than European-style leagues with promotion, relegation, and entry I couldn't quite say. But given the existence of the closed-cartel system, all the returns to falling costs will accrue to the owners. So what's the point?

Correction, April 16, 2013: This post originally misspelled Edward McClelland's name and misidentified Mike Ilitch as Mitch Ilitich.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.


Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Sept. 17 2014 10:36 AM MacArthur Fellow Alison Bechdel Recounts Telling Her Mother About Her Best-Selling Memoir MacArthur Fellow Alison Bechdel recounts telling her mother about her best-selling memoir.
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
Sept. 17 2014 11:06 AM Inside the Exclusive World of Members-Only Clubs
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 11:14 AM How Does That Geometry Problem Make You Feel? Computer tutors that can read students’ emotions.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 11:18 AM A Bridge Across the Sky
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.