After years of bad legal music options versus the bounty of illicit downloads, online streaming music services have created a consumer paradise. With Spotify, Rdio (my favorite) or Pandora you can listen to all the music you want for little-to-no money and extraordinary convenience. It's like magic. It almost seems too good to be true.
And as Ben Sisario writes, it basically is too good to be true. These firms kick modest royalties back to the record companies, who kick even more modest royalties back to the artists, who end up with very little money.
That artists aren't making much money shouldn't be enough, as such, to turn people against the services. The reality is that it's always been the case that most musicians earn very meager sums of money. In exchange, you get to do something people generally think is cool and you have a small chance at making tons of money by becoming a superstar. But a question everyone ought to be asking themselves is, given how little money artists make off this paradigm, why are other people making so much? Are record companies really adding meaningful value to this industry trend? Are the streaming services themselves?
TODAY IN SLATE
Scalia’s Liberal Streak
The conservative justice’s most brilliant—and surprisingly progressive—moments on the bench.
Colorado Is Ground Zero for the Fight Over Female Voters
There’s a Way to Keep Ex-Cons Out of Prison That Pays for Itself. Why Don’t More States Use It?
The NFL Explains How It Sees “the Role of the Female”
The Music Industry Is Ignoring Some of the Best Black Women Singing R&B
Theo’s Joint and Vanessa’s Whiskey
No sitcom did the “Very Special Episode” as well as The Cosby Show.
The Other Huxtable Effect
Thirty years ago, The Cosby Show gave us one of TV’s great feminists.