Payroll tax holiday: NY Fed research shows it spiked consumption more than expected.

The Payroll Tax Consumption Bump Was Bigger Than Expected

A blog about business and economics.
Jan. 29 2013 3:58 PM

The Payroll Tax Consumption Bump Was Bigger Than Expected

A cornerstone in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Here's an interesting finding from the New York Fed—the payroll tax holiday seems to have done more to goose consumption than workers themselves expected:

This paper presents new survey evidence on workers’ response to the 2011 payroll tax cuts. While workers intended to spend 10 to 18 percent of their tax-cut income, they reported actually spending 28 to 43 percent of the funds. This is higher than estimates from studies of recent tax cuts, and arguably a consequence of the design of the 2011 tax cuts. The shift to greater consumption than intended is largely unexplained by presentbias or unanticipated shocks, and is likely a consequence of mental accounting. We also use data from a complementary survey to understand the heterogeneous tax-cut response.

There's a bit of conventional wisdom out that it's better for a fiscal stimulus to goose consumption than to be used for savings. You can see why that might be. A recession is essentially a mismatch between people's desire to save and firms' desire to invest, so something that reduces desired savings would seem to help. But at the same time, when you have a recession characterized by extremely large household debt overhang, helping households reduce their debt loads might be equally valuable. So I think it's not entirely clear whether this means the payroll tax holiday was a better-than-expected idea or a worse-than-expected one—or else, possibly, it doesn't matter.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

  Slate Plus
Lexicon Valley
March 31 2015 9:17 AM The Redline of March Overheard on email: Slates copy desk rounds up the month’s style and grammar rulings.