Campaign Spending Is Very Poor Economic Stimulus

Moneybox
A blog about business and economics.
Nov. 7 2012 2:28 PM

Campaign Spending Is Very Poor Economic Stimulus

So at the end of a multi-billion dollar campaign, relatively little is different in the American government. So was it all a huge waste, or did we at least get some useful economic stimulus out of this? I'd say mostly waste. Heavy spending on campaign television advertisements is like a textbook example of things that don't boost the economy.

Recall that a recession is essentially a situation in which planned investments and desired savings don't balance out, leaving idle resources in the economy. A cut in interest rates can stimulate investment by bringing that balance back into line. So can a brand new invention. The amazing new gizmo creates demand not just for gizmos but for brand new factories and wearhouses to make and sell them. Federal fiscal policy can also work in this regard. But a sudden surge of outside ad spending on North Dakota TV stations induced by an unexpectedly close Senate race doesn't inspire those stations to invest in new facilities. All that happens is they raise prices and boost their short-term profits. It's good news for the station, but just a shift of wealth away from Sheldon Adelson and to the owners of local TV stations in hot election markets.

Advertisement

What's more, there's significant crowding out here. Every ad that Romney or Obama ran in Ohio was an extra 15 or 30 seconds that wasn't used to air some other advertisement. The total flow of advertising through the system is basically fixed, and increased demand for airtime is just inflationary. As I've said before, we can tell the economy as a whole suffered from a negative demand shock rather than a negative supply shock because inflation fell and we've never caught up—a telltale sign of economy-wide resource idling. But in the specific case of TV advertising we see the reverse. Higher demand plus supply constraints equals higher prices rather than more resource utilization.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

TODAY IN SLATE

The World

How Canada’s Shooting Tragedies Have Shaped Its Gun Control Politics

Where Ebola Lives Between Outbreaks

Gunman Killed Inside Canadian Parliament; Soldier Shot at National Monument Dies

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?

Paul Farmer: Up to 90 Percent of Ebola Patients Should Survive

Is he right?

Science

“I’m Not a Scientist” Is No Excuse

Politicians brag about their ignorance while making ignorant decisions.

Technology

Driving in Circles

The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

In Praise of 13th Grade: Why a Fifth Year of High School Is a Great Idea 

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 22 2014 9:42 PM Landslide Landrieu Can the Louisiana Democrat use the powers of incumbency to save herself one more time?
  Business
Continuously Operating
Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
  Life
Gentleman Scholar
Oct. 22 2014 5:54 PM May I Offer to Sharpen My Friends’ Knives? Or would that be rude?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 22 2014 4:27 PM Three Ways Your Text Messages Change After You Get Married
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 22 2014 9:19 PM The Phone Call Is Twenty Minutes of Pitch-Perfect, Wrenching Cinema
  Technology
Future Tense
Oct. 22 2014 5:33 PM One More Reason Not to Use PowerPoint: It’s The Gateway for a Serious Windows Vulnerability
  Health & Science
Wild Things
Oct. 22 2014 2:42 PM Orcas, Via Drone, for the First Time Ever
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.