Everyone knows that auto sales over the past few years have been much lower than they were back before the financial crisis. That seems like a cyclical phenomenon, but people also wonder if it's tied in to larger shifts in demographics, taste, or transportation patterns. Duncan Black points out, for example, that per capita vehicle miles traveled actually peaked in 2004 well before any sign of recession.
Something that I discovered more recently screwing around with FRED charts is that this decline has arguably been longer in the making than people realize. Here's a chart of millions of cars sold divided by thousands of net new people. You can see that it's a very cyclical kind of thing—the population keeps growing pretty steadily, but the car sales collapse and rebound:
That looks to me, however, like a downward drifting trend since the mid-eighties. And unfortunately the data only dates to the mid-seventies so it's difficult to know what was happening before that. It's hard to know just from these numbers how much of the issue is increased durability and longevity of cars and how much of it is an actual declining appetite for the vehicles. But the apparent steadiness of cyclically adjusted light vehicle sales over these decades is in part an artifact of population growth—and with population growth slowing that may mean a domestic auto market that doesn't really fully recover the way people are expecting.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Right Target
Why Obama’s airstrikes against ISIS may be more effective than people expect.
The One National Holiday Republicans Hope You Forget
It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is
I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights
Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.
Should You Recline Your Seat? Two Economists Weigh In.
It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.