It's a little bit surprising to me that conservatives have managed to turn this into a subject of controversy, but here's a newish research paper I saw on the National Bureau of Economic Research website that investigates the question of whether giving health insurance to poor children has a positive impact on health outcomes.
The answer is yes—the early Medicaid expansions they looked at had a substantial impact on later-life mortality of black teenagers.
Obviously many people have countervailing concerns about the total volume of federal expenditures in general and federal expenditures on health care services in particular. One could square that concern with basic concern for human welfare by proposing that we shift resources out of provision of health care services to the elderly (i.e., Medicare) and toward provision of health care services to poor families and especially their children (i.e., Medicaid). But the currently Republican plan is to do the reverse and subject low-income children to much more severe cutbacks than the elderly.
TODAY IN SLATE
Slate Plus Early Read: The Self-Made Man
The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.
Mitt Romney May Be Weighing a 2016 Run. That Would Be a Big Mistake.
Amazing Photos From Hong Kong’s Umbrella Revolution
Transparent Is the Fall’s Only Great New Show
Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada
Now, journalists can't even say her name.
Lena Dunham, the Book
More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.