The Difference Between Bitter Clingers and 47 Percent

A blog about business and economics.
Sept. 18 2012 11:14 AM

The Difference Between Bitter Clingers and 47 Percent

I'm reading a lot of folks in the press comparing Mitt Romney's remarks about the 47 percent to Barack Obama's remarks about working class whites who get bitter and cling to guns and religion rather than voting for Democrats. This reflects, I think, an undue focus on gaffes qua gaffes rather than public statements as a source of insight into politicians views and agendas.

As gaffes, these are similar in that they involve candidates insulting large classes of voters through condescension. But most of the evidence we have is that gaffes don't really impact election outcomes.

Advertisement

A separate question is what did we learn from these remarks about the candidates' agenda. What Obama said was that he wasn't going to compromise on the culture war issues that he thinks drives some voters into GOP arms ("guns and religion") but that his hope is that better economic policies will lead to better outcomes for these voters which will cause them to become less bitter and clingy. In other words, Obama believes Obama's agenda will be good for working class whites in West Virginia and Pennsylvania even though those people may not believe him now or be inclined to vote for him. Romney seems to be saying the reverse. Not that people in the bottom half of the income distribution won't vote for him even though his agenda is better for them, but that people in the bottom half of the income distribution won't vote for him precisely because his agenda is bad for them.

Obama is making a false consciousness argument. Romney is making a correct consciousness argument. The condescension is similar but the content of the statements is totally different.

Matthew Yglesias is the executive editor of Vox and author of The Rent Is Too Damn High.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Science

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

The Ungodly Horror of Having a Bug Crawl Into Your Ear and Scratch Away at Your Eardrum

We Could Fix Climate Change for Free. What Exactly Is Holding Us Back?

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 6:09 PM Here's Who Voted to Fund Syrian Rebels and Get This ISIS Conflict Really Cooking
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Gentleman Scholar
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM Should Men Still Open Doors for Women? Or is it ungentlemanly to do so at all?  
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 6:14 PM Today in Gender Gaps: Biking
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 5:56 PM Watch Louis C.K., Dave Chappelle, Bill Hicks, Mitch Hedberg, and More on New YouTube Channel
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 5:26 PM If Fixing Global Warming Is Free, What’s the Holdup?
  Health & Science
Jurisprudence
Sept. 17 2014 4:49 PM Schooling the Supreme Court on Rap Music Is it art or a true threat of violence?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?